Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!
|
 Anno
Experimenter
Registered: 06/18/99
Posts: 24,096
Loc: my room
Last seen: 3 days, 5 hours
|
|
So, any progress?
|
figgusfiddus
Arrogant Worm
Registered: 02/02/07
Posts: 2,126
Loc: Figgus, Fiddia
Last seen: 4 years, 7 months
|
 Re: Growers Vocabulary 101  [Re: Anno]
#7300106 - 08/16/07 08:07 AM (5 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Only the Glossary update and its conversion to CMS, which I messaged you about previously. Again, if you don't like any of the content edits, please revert them manually with your info or discuss them, either way--I think all of the entries I expanded were very carefully checked for accuracy. Formatting isn't the best, but I was more concerned with getting the info converted and out there and updated and allowing people to edit it than with making it pretty. Amazing work again for having compiled the original page, which is quite extensive.
I've been hit with a load of real-life work that has kept me pretty busy the past week, but presently my sights are set on compiling all those loose FAQs into a single FAQ file, or perhaps several files with subdivisions by subject. The main problem is an organizational one, as I said before--it's just a matter of moving all these into one file (as they should've been in the first place, really, like every other FAQ on the web) and setting them into some kind of logical order. In other words, a lot of grunt work, but I'll be happy enough to see it done that I'm not about to complain about the tedium. 
Then I'd like to start working on something like I described before, if I can get enough cooperative energy going: the Shroomery take on the BRF cake, from start to fruiting, to replace any info in the PF tek that's completely rotten. Not dissimilar from PF in essence, but cutting out a lot of the chaff, and removing the just plain bad info (e.g. "you should incubate at 86F", and "you need a drip shield"). I think we can get enough of a consensus going to at least chop those out, while indicating where there is significant controversy among the other elements, a la the Wikipedia style (e.g. "Some people think A because X, while other people think B because Y, but both methods have been used effectively.").
That can be followed up by a basic cooperative Shroomery tek for various bulk methods.
--------------------
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS
Edited by figgusfiddus (08/16/07 08:14 AM)
|
Anno
Experimenter
Registered: 06/18/99
Posts: 24,096
Loc: my room
Last seen: 3 days, 5 hours
|
|
>Not dissimilar from PF in essence, but cutting out a lot of the chaff, and
>removing the just plain bad info (e.g. "you should incubate at 86F"
Where in the PF tek have you seen the "you should incubate at 86F" part?
| |
|
|
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Magash, Az0th, george castanza, Prisoner#1, RogerRabbit, Citric, total, FooMan, stonesun, EvilMushroom666, Javadog
1,036 topic views. 20 members, 85 guests and 4 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic ]
| | |
|
|
|
Images only 
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Shop for: 
Edit 
Reply 
