Home | Community | Message Board


FreeSpores.com
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Spirituality & Mysticism

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Amazon Shop for: Scales

Jump to first unread post. Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >  [ show all ]
OfflineCaptainExtra
Captain Obvious'ev0l twin
Registered: 10/04/05
Posts: 159
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: dblaney]
    #4783575 - 10/10/05 07:04 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

No, no, no.

Da police question others. Da police.

One forum please without da conversation police come to bust other people's views!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBooby
Agent Mulder
 User Gallery
Registered: 09/14/05
Posts: 3,781
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: dblaney]
    #4783673 - 10/10/05 07:19 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

Question people about their beliefs whithout criticism


--------------------
Let it not be remembered
That mycelium eats detritus and dies
But that life in all it's glory
Counts mycelium to be on it's side.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineGomp
¡(Bound to·(O))be free!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/11/04
Posts: 10,578
Loc: I re·side [primarily] in...
Last seen: 6 hours, 53 minutes
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Booby]
    #4783732 - 10/10/05 07:28 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

How would you know if it will be taken critical? ..

what a "rule" this is..


--------------------

--------------------
Disclaimer!?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBooby
Agent Mulder
 User Gallery
Registered: 09/14/05
Posts: 3,781
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Gomp]
    #4783745 - 10/10/05 07:29 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

Good point.


--------------------
Let it not be remembered
That mycelium eats detritus and dies
But that life in all it's glory
Counts mycelium to be on it's side.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleAz0thM
quantum transfiguration
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/13/00
Posts: 53,455
Loc: The Void Flag
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: dblaney]
    #4785457 - 10/11/05 01:12 AM (7 years, 7 months ago)

Question is one thing. Being cynical/mocking/conodescending with a question is another.


--------------------
~Thought Creates Reality~


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCervantesM
Devil's Advocate
Female User Gallery

Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 15,826
Loc: Dark Side of the Windmill
Last seen: 5 hours, 16 minutes
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Az0th]
    #4785465 - 10/11/05 01:13 AM (7 years, 7 months ago)

Are you talking of flaming or something else?

Can we argue the points of the post as long as we don't attack the poster?


--------------------
I know you think you understand the words I have just said to you but, what you fail to realize is, what you thought I said is not what I actually meant by saying what I said, when I said it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleAz0thM
quantum transfiguration
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/13/00
Posts: 53,455
Loc: The Void Flag
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Cervantes]
    #4785490 - 10/11/05 01:18 AM (7 years, 7 months ago)

Yes you can argue the points.. as long as you are not calling someone's ideas stupid or some such. There's a difference between "arguing" to get a clearer picture of what someone is trying to communicate, i.e - understanding... and "arguing" just for the sake of debate or to try and knock someone down. I agree the rule #3 needs to be elaborated on. Am open for suggestions.


--------------------
~Thought Creates Reality~


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCervantesM
Devil's Advocate
Female User Gallery

Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 15,826
Loc: Dark Side of the Windmill
Last seen: 5 hours, 16 minutes
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Az0th]
    #4785502 - 10/11/05 01:20 AM (7 years, 7 months ago)

3) If you must debate: Debate the quality of the points a person makes, and not the quality of the person who made them.

?


--------------------
I know you think you understand the words I have just said to you but, what you fail to realize is, what you thought I said is not what I actually meant by saying what I said, when I said it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibledblaney
Human Being

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 7,894
Loc: Here & Now
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Cervantes]
    #4786188 - 10/11/05 06:09 AM (7 years, 7 months ago)

I like that, but I fear it could end up with someone just debasing every point someone makes (e.g. "That's the dumbest idea I've ever heard", etc)

3. Personal attacks are not allowed, and don't go into a debate with a holier than thou attitude.

Maybe something along those lines?


--------------------
"What is in us that turns a deaf ear to the cries of human suffering?"

"Belief is a beautiful armor
But makes for the heaviest sword"
- John Mayer

Making the noise "penicillin" is no substitute for actually taking penicillin.

"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it." -Abraham Lincoln


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCervantesM
Devil's Advocate
Female User Gallery

Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 15,826
Loc: Dark Side of the Windmill
Last seen: 5 hours, 16 minutes
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: dblaney]
    #4786219 - 10/11/05 06:55 AM (7 years, 7 months ago)

We can only judge posts, not the attitude of the poster. Al Gore hasn't invented THAT internet... yet.

And asking people not to go into the Spirituality Forum with a, "Holier than thou attitude" is a little bit confusing.


--------------------
I know you think you understand the words I have just said to you but, what you fail to realize is, what you thought I said is not what I actually meant by saying what I said, when I said it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineAnnomM
※※※※※※
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6,329
Loc: Europe
Last seen: 1 day, 20 hours
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Cervantes]
    #4786241 - 10/11/05 07:15 AM (7 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

Cervantes said:
We can only judge posts, not the attitude of the poster.




Yes, I agree. Always did btw.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibledblaney
Human Being

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 7,894
Loc: Here & Now
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Cervantes]
    #4787293 - 10/11/05 02:53 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

:grin:

Note to self: don't make posts at 6 in the morning when you're delirious.

What I meant to say was that posters and debaters shouldn't be self-righteous. I'm not at all sure what I meant by holier than thou...that just made no sense.


--------------------
"What is in us that turns a deaf ear to the cries of human suffering?"

"Belief is a beautiful armor
But makes for the heaviest sword"
- John Mayer

Making the noise "penicillin" is no substitute for actually taking penicillin.

"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it." -Abraham Lincoln


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblegettinjiggywithit
jiggy
Female User Gallery

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 7,469
Loc: Heart of Laughter
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: dblaney]
    #4787525 - 10/11/05 03:55 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

If confusion is there then, being as clear as possible is key.

I thought the new deal here was that truths were to be treated in a subjective nature and therefor can't be proven objectively right or wrong so don't even bother. Same with experiences of the intangible nature. They can't be proven objectively so why bothering arguing over right and wrongs in those areas.

Say two people are sharing tips and tricks for energy body work or communing with the angels or something like that. Of course they should be expecting to be questioning each other. The difference is, that in a sharing discussion, they are doing it to gather more information relative to an area of mutual interest. They already believe too. They just want to explore details others have found. They can discern for themselves on their own time with the new information gathered if its useful or trash.

A debate entails the dynamic of raising arguments and points for why one method is right and one is wrong. That gets to hostile for some, who are happy with their methods.

Even still, if two people agree to argue over it then, fine. Why not ask the person if they would like to argue or debate the post or not before diving into one. Simple enough, If they say no, back off.

If someone wants to come along and say, "there is no energy body and angels don't exists," well then, we are back to the old S&P.

People who already believe in either just don't want to waste time or energy proving what they can't or in being defensive. Typically most people don't care if others believe their abstract beliefs or not.

A few push beliefs on others aggressively. Thats something the mods should catch and move the post over to the debate forum so others can push back-hard.

Why not add something that says,

Beliefs are to be treated as subjective and abstract in nature here. Requests for others to prove or defend them in an objective are not allowed.

You may questions their beliefs to gain a better understanding of them. You may also comment on how yours in that area differ or are somewhat similar to add more views and details of interest to the topic.

If you wish to argue or debate the details of a common area of interest, ask the other person if they would like to as well before engaging in arguments.


Is that still confusing?

Can someone better with words tighten that up a bit?


--------------------
Ahuwale ka nane huna.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibledblaney
Human Being

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 7,894
Loc: Here & Now
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: dblaney]
    #4788775 - 10/11/05 09:36 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

bump...the poll closes on friday


--------------------
"What is in us that turns a deaf ear to the cries of human suffering?"

"Belief is a beautiful armor
But makes for the heaviest sword"
- John Mayer

Making the noise "penicillin" is no substitute for actually taking penicillin.

"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it." -Abraham Lincoln


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCervantesM
Devil's Advocate
Female User Gallery

Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 15,826
Loc: Dark Side of the Windmill Flag
Last seen: 5 hours, 16 minutes
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: gettinjiggywithit]
    #4791040 - 10/12/05 02:53 AM (7 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

If you wish to argue or debate the details of a common area of interest, ask the other person if they would like to as well before engaging in arguments.


Is that still confusing?

Can someone better with words tighten that up a bit?




I fear waiting for permission to question a person's beliefs, is too S L O W for The Shroomery.

This segragation AND lack of definition, is exactly why I suggested we keep S&P together, and move threads to SUBFORUMS when they became problematic.... otherwise, how the hell do we define this stuff?


--------------------
I know you think you understand the words I have just said to you but, what you fail to realize is, what you thought I said is not what I actually meant by saying what I said, when I said it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibledblaney
Human Being

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 7,894
Loc: Here & Now
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Cervantes]
    #4791993 - 10/12/05 11:53 AM (7 years, 7 months ago)

I'm with you on that one man, I voted to keep S&P together.


--------------------
"What is in us that turns a deaf ear to the cries of human suffering?"

"Belief is a beautiful armor
But makes for the heaviest sword"
- John Mayer

Making the noise "penicillin" is no substitute for actually taking penicillin.

"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it." -Abraham Lincoln


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCervantesM
Devil's Advocate
Female User Gallery

Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 15,826
Loc: Dark Side of the Windmill Flag
Last seen: 5 hours, 16 minutes
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: dblaney]
    #4792824 - 10/12/05 03:02 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

I'd allow questions in THIS forum, and add a sub-forum for people who wish to post w/o being questioned.... obviously, the poll shows them to be in the minority... but they need a place to post, too... or The Staff will go insane protecting their feelings.

Although, if you allow questions in here, again, why did we need to split?

If we allow questions in BOTH forums, they're practically the same... why cut a conversation short, by presenting it in ONE forum, to only HALF the S&P community?


--------------------
I know you think you understand the words I have just said to you but, what you fail to realize is, what you thought I said is not what I actually meant by saying what I said, when I said it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibledblaney
Human Being

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 7,894
Loc: Here & Now
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Cervantes]
    #4792838 - 10/12/05 03:06 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

That sounds like a good idea to me :thumbup:


--------------------
"What is in us that turns a deaf ear to the cries of human suffering?"

"Belief is a beautiful armor
But makes for the heaviest sword"
- John Mayer

Making the noise "penicillin" is no substitute for actually taking penicillin.

"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it." -Abraham Lincoln


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblegettinjiggywithit
jiggy
Female User Gallery

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 7,469
Loc: Heart of Laughter
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: Cervantes]
    #4793130 - 10/12/05 04:02 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

Cervantes said:
Quote:

If you wish to argue or debate the details of a common area of interest, ask the other person if they would like to as well before engaging in arguments.


Is that still confusing?

Can someone better with words tighten that up a bit?




I fear waiting for permission to question a person's beliefs, is too S L O W for The Shroomery.

This segragation AND lack of definition, is exactly why I suggested we keep S&P together, and move threads to SUBFORUMS when they became problematic.... otherwise, how the hell do we define this stuff?




Maybe the exercise in patience will due some people some good to practice. Often when people go in for the argument debate attack, they are hot about something and that can create a quick  drama flair up and a strong reaction by someone caught off guard.

If they have to wait a bit first and or get a chance to put guards up to shift into debate mode when originally they were in pleasant discussion mode, the one side may cool down a bit FIRST, and the other, if willing to debate, will be able to shift to their own offensive stance instead of being caught off guard in a defensive "whiny stance". It could and should make for more FAIR, constructive and respectful debating.

Or is that to mature of a solution? Is it better to let people fly off the handle in debate attack mode when they are hot for the kill and let people get caught of guard get creamed before they even knew what hit them, then get whiny? Thats the stuff that creates a hostile drama filled environment. The people who like that have P&R.

There are a lot of people angry with the world who come to message boards just to abuse anything they see that looks weak, to take that aggression out to get some relief.

Thats BS for it to be dumped on people who want to have some light hearted discussion with people who share common interests on the Internet. I thought that was the main premise for the split. Some what heated debate with the S&P topics and some want chill discussion with them and some want a little of both.

I don;t see whats the big deal with asking a hot headed or angry hearted person to take a chill pill first and get permission to engage in a civilized duel with another who may be agreeable to that first.

What are we, savages who sneak attack the unarmed, from behind trees, or can we have civilized dueling matches with two parties agreed and prepared to duel arguments?

I think many who voted for the split just got tired of being in an angry, abusive, hostile conflict drama filled environment when they just wanted to freely and openly discuss "with guards down", things of a spiritual, religious, esoteric, mystical, philosophical nature.

Why are people having a hard time understanding and respecting that?

Maybe they should put a post up in the mental health forum asking people to help them with their problem of wanting to live in hostile abusive and angry environment where ever they go.

That's not healthy.

I don't think, these request for unagreed upon debate here will be given because that totally defeats the purpose and intent of why this forum was constructed. It was created for people who wanted to "discuss" areas of common interest, not debate them.

Asking questions to gain more information for learning and better understanding YES. Questioning just so you can get more information to tell people how wrong and delusional they are, NO.

If it did become accepted and allowed here, it would become just like the old S&P and be just like the P&R we have now.

Why do people who have no constructive interest in the subject matter of this forum, want so much to control, oppress and discourage the interest of others in it?

Every day, more and more people are waking up to the intangible realities of spirit and for some reason, that seems to scare people. So they try to attack and kill what they fear. Maybe they have made some headway with it at the shroomery, but they can't stop it happening on a global scale. Maybe it's time they learn to get a grip on themselves with it.

Some people just want to sometimes share care learn love and grow in a healthy constructive environment peacefully, with some good natured humor thrown in.

Like that is such a bad thing. The world could use a lot  more of it from my view.

What kind of mind says, "Oh NO! We will have NONE of THAT!" ? :confused:

:peace: :heart:


--------------------
Ahuwale ka nane huna.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibledblaney
Human Being

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 7,894
Loc: Here & Now
Re: Should we be allowed to... (poll) [Re: gettinjiggywithit]
    #4793179 - 10/12/05 04:13 PM (7 years, 7 months ago)

I think the idea is to have people anticipate the question of whether or not they're willing to debate their stance, and post in the appropriate forum/sub-forum.

Some people just want to sometimes share care learn love and grow in a healthy constructive environment peacefully, with some good natured humor thrown in.

Like that is such a bad thing. The world could use a lot more of it from my view.


:thumbup:

What kind of mind says, "Oh NO! We will have NONE of THAT!" ?

Unfortunately, quite a number of people, or so I've found. :frown:


--------------------
"What is in us that turns a deaf ear to the cries of human suffering?"

"Belief is a beautiful armor
But makes for the heaviest sword"
- John Mayer

Making the noise "penicillin" is no substitute for actually taking penicillin.

"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it." -Abraham Lincoln


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >  [ show all ]

Amazon Shop for: Scales

General Interest >> Spirituality & Mysticism

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* who hates jesus * poll
( 1 2 all )
Casualty 852 35 03/27/06 01:55 PM
by Seuss
* -=Poll=- |Elucidation| Immortals, Avatars, Prophets and Geniuses isander 924 17 11/20/05 04:07 PM
by Booby
* Bible argument? Syle 615 10 06/10/07 05:42 PM
by Syle
* Is humor allowed here?
( 1 2 all )
Swami 1,744 20 10/14/05 01:07 PM
by Silversoul
* Kind of a Poll
Apollyphelion
418 5 07/08/07 12:59 PM
by daytripper23
* The Next Christianity spud 1,028 16 01/30/06 05:54 PM
by Gliders
* The designated talk-about-the-forum thread
( 1 2 3 all )
Wiccan_SeekerA 2,993 43 12/16/05 03:16 PM
by MAIA
* Gog, Magog and the Kingdom of the Khazars - Part I MAIA 951 2 07/18/06 12:36 PM
by MAIA

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Rev. Morton, Az0th, Diploid, Kickle, c0sm0nautt
2,303 topic views. 4 members, 5 guests and 0 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:
DaVinci Vaporizer
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2013 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.075 seconds spending 0.002 seconds on 17 queries.