Quote:

---

According to the Honduran newspaper, Tiempo, as well as the Honduran human rights group, COFADEH, the agents of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), dressed in military uniforms, killed at least four and possibly six civilians in a raid which took place on Friday, May 11. The victims included two pregnant women and two children. The newspaper Tiempo did not pull any punches, writing that those killed "were humble and honest citizens." Apparently, the DEA agents fired from helicopter gunships upon a boat carrying civilians on the Patuca back to their community of Ahuas which itself is located in the Mosquito coast of Honduras. According to Tiempo, the DEA mistakenly fired upon the civilian boat because it was well-lit while the intended target -- a boat carrying drug traffickers -- was floating down the river without its lights on.

According to Tiempo, the mayor of Ahuas decried the killings, saying that "[t]hese operations were performed irresponsibly" and that the people in his community live in fear "because they now have the threat of operations because they kill poor people... "

COFADEH, the Committee of the Families of the Disappeared of Honduras, has been very pointed in its condemnation of the role the U.S. played in these killings. COFADEH was founded in 1982 in response to the disappearance of 69 persons that year. As COFADEH explains on its website , it believes that the disappearances which took place in the 1980's (a total of 184 between 1980 and 1989), was the direct result of the National Security Doctrine which the U.S. imposed on Honduras. This doctrine, according to COFADEH, "included a systematic and selective form of human rights violations. The most emblematic violations were torture, murders and enforced disappearances" of the type which the U.S. had sponsored in the Southern Cone of South America in the 1970s.

COFADEH has taken on renewed importance in Honduras after the 2009 military coup against President Manual Zelaya which was at least tacitly supported by the United States. Since that time, the types of killings and disappearances which led to COFADEH's creation have started again, and are entirely the responsibility of the U.S.-supported coup government. Thus, according to a wonderful February, 2012 piece in the New York Times by Dana Frank, who relies heavily on COFADEH's figures, "at least 34 members of the opposition have disappeared or been killed, and more than 300 people have been killed by state security forces since the coup," including at least 13 journalists. Sadly, in researching this article, I discovered that a kind and brave woman, Vanessa Zepeda, who I had the honor of meeting on a School of Americas Watch delegation to Honduras shortly after the coup, has since been killed as a direct consequence of this coup. See, list of victims of the coup.

In response to the DEA killings, COFADEH put out a statement entitled, "Effects of the Military Occupation," which blames the U.S.'s decades-long policies in Latin America for the continued violence in countries like Honduras. As COFADEH stated:

    ... a foreign army [i.e., the U.S. army] protected under the new hegemonic concept of the "war on drugs," legalized with reforms to the 1953 Military Treaty, violates our territorial sovereignty and kills civilians as if it was in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya or Syria.

    Two pregnant women, two children and two adult males were killed by shots fired from helicopter gunships piloted by U.S. soldiers on a boat on River Patuca returning to their community. They were workers in the local lobster and shellfish diving industry.

    ... [T]he "failed state" of Honduras gave way to the foreign military occupation under the script of the "war against the drug cartels," similar to what has happened in the past eight years in Mexico, Colombia and Guatemala.

    And this reality, from the perspective of a human rights organization, is unacceptable and reprehensible.



As COFADEH recognizes in this statement, the U.S. is very much at war in Latin America, from Mexico through Central America and to Colombia, leaving a wake of violence and bodies in its path. A recent article by Tom Burghardt describes in detail how the U.S. is indeed the prime source of the grisly violence plaguing this region. Thus, the U.S., in fighting the so-called "war on drugs," is fueling the conflict with guns and advanced weaponry -- weaponry which helps to prop up repressive governments such as those in Mexico, Honduras and Colombia; which in any case ends up in the hands of the very drug cartels the U.S. is claiming to fight (e.g., through the Fast & Furious program); and which is killing massive numbers of civilians (50,000 in Mexico and 250,000 in Colombia). No wonder then that the entire region was united against the U.S. and Canada in calling at the Summit of the Americas for the end to this war and to the de-criminalization of drugs.

Yet, due to the media blackout on such issues, the vast majority of Americans do not even know that the U.S. is at war just south of our borders and do not understand why our Southern neighbors are crying out for a change in this senseless policy. The media's failure in this regard is inexcusable.

---

Quote:

---

Smitington said:
The drug war useless?  You guys kidding me?  Sure, it is useless for tackling drug problems, but that is not what it is about... get with the program guys.

---

how screwed it up is it that a guy gets democratically elected, then we help support a military coup to put someone else in place, and support them even though they're corrupt.

also notice since the coup, there's been a huge increase in drugs and trafficking, which is also when these type of disappearances and killings appear which at least indirectly involve the u.s.

yea our government wants to spread democracy and is in no way corrupt 

Quote:

---

Much of the press in the United States has attributed this violence solely to drug trafficking and gangs. But the coup was what threw open the doors to a huge increase in drug trafficking and violence, and it unleashed a continuing wave of state-sponsored repression.

The current government of President Lobo won power in a November 2009 election managed by the same figures who had initiated the coup. Most opposition candidates withdrew in protest, and all major international observers boycotted the election, except for the National Democratic Institute and the International Republican Institute, which are financed by the United States. President Obama quickly recognized Mr. Lobo’s victory, even when most of Latin America would not. Mr. Lobo’s government is, in fact, a child of the coup. It retains most of the military figures who perpetrated the coup, and no one has gone to jail for starting it.

This chain of events — a coup that the United States didn’t stop, a fraudulent election that it accepted — has now allowed corruption to mushroom. The judicial system hardly functions. Impunity reigns. At least 34 members of the opposition have disappeared or been killed, and more than 300 people have been killed by state security forces since the coup, according to the leading human rights organization Cofadeh. At least 13 journalists have been killed since Mr. Lobo took office, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.

---

Quote:

---

"A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death." - Martin Luther King Jr.

---

Quote:

---

bigmike7104 said:
how screwed it up is it that a guy gets democratically elected, then we help support a military coup to put someone else in place, and support them even though they're corrupt.

---

Quote:

---

k00laid said:

Quote:

---

bigmike7104 said:
how screwed it up is it that a guy gets democratically elected, then we help support a military coup to put someone else in place, and support them even though they're corrupt.

---

do some more research into the killing the Libyan president, qaddafi

---

Dude I was flippin out during the entire time way before he got popped!

Apparently the whole time the only foreign troops that were there was some dutch special forces squad that was "escorting an important citizen out of the warzone"

months later, turns out the US spec ops, SAS spec ops, etc., were also there doing shit....

Gaddafi was a puppet for the US and UK's intelligence and anti-terrorist community, and as soon as he started saying shit his government collapsed and france bombed the shit out of them.... or should I say "Nato".

Also, look up "structural oppression through neo-colonialism"

The world is exactly the same as it was in the 15,16, and 1700s- white people are still dominating everything and everyone

the "American dream" consists of keeping 90% of the world in poverty...

but hey, haven't we gotten a little off topic?

Quote:

---

k00laid said:

Quote:

---

bigmike7104 said:
how screwed it up is it that a guy gets democratically elected, then we help support a military coup to put someone else in place, and support them even though they're corrupt.

---

do some more research into the killing the Libyan president, qaddafi

---

Quote:

---

The Associated Press reported last Friday that villagers in the northern coastal region of Honduras were burning government buildings there to protest the DEA presence.

---