Home | Community | Message Board


Azarius
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: < Back | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 42,253
Last seen: 2 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: SmokeeThaBandit]
    #16193605 - 05/07/12 07:35 AM (1 year, 12 days ago)

Quote:

SmokeeThaBandit said:
Romney went to Harvard as well, he actually got two degrees from Harvard.




I wonder if he described himself as a minority
Quote:




It's no wonder you're so angry after reading so many hate-filled sites though.  Grab a beer and relax man.




Beer is my friend
Quote:



But seriously, if the Cherokee Nation will elect someone who is also 1/32 native as their Principle Chief, then there should be no problems with Elizabeth Warren describing herself as part native American. 


More typical righty paranoia.




It isn't paranoia.
Quote:



And oh my God, a book Obama wrote in 1995, might not have been 100% truth?  What a fucking scandal.




I don't believe he wrote the book but autobiographies aren't supposed to be fiction.
Quote:




Anything to keep people from talking about Mittens, I suppose.




People have been talking about Mittens for months.  Or didn't you know he had been in a Primary?


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 42,253
Last seen: 2 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: Not Quite Social]
    #16193607 - 05/07/12 07:37 AM (1 year, 12 days ago)

Quote:

Not Quite Social said:
Oh, I got this one ...

I fixed Ron Paul's quote for you:

Quote:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave the federal government unprecedented power over the hiring, employee relations, and customer service practices of every business in the country. The result was a massive violation correction of the rights wrongs of private property and contract, which are were the bedrocks of free racist society.




Now, don't try baiting Zappa into agreeing with L. Ron again.



I agree with L. Ron on many things.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleNot Quite Social
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/16/10
Posts: 1,336
Loc: Midwest
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: zappaisgod]
    #16193770 - 05/07/12 09:34 AM (1 year, 12 days ago)

Fireworks God,

If you think about it, the linguistic ambiguity contained within the sentence, "I knew a man with a wooden leg named Smith" is not funny.  Common sense tells you that the man is named Smith, not the leg.  As it turns out, when you deconstruct and apply common sense to a joke you excise the humor.  Ironically, this same technique can also be used to remove the pretense of seriousness from a trite criticism.


--------------------


The People's History


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineFalcon91Wolvrn03
Stranger
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/16/05
Posts: 1,867
Last seen: 17 hours, 19 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: Not Quite Social]
    #16194243 - 05/07/12 12:40 PM (1 year, 12 days ago)

Quote:

Not Quite Social said:
Fireworks God,

If you think about it, the linguistic ambiguity contained within the sentence, "I knew a man with a wooden leg named Smith" is not funny.  Common sense tells you that the man is named Smith, not the leg.  As it turns out, when you deconstruct and apply common sense to a joke you excise the humor.  Ironically, this same technique can also be used to remove the pretense of seriousness from a trite criticism.




:thumbup:


--------------------
I love how the right makes shit up about what Obama is going to do, and then scare themselves with it. - Falcon91Wolvrn03
                                                                 


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleDieCommie
El Guapo

Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 25,374
Loc: Street of Dreams
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: zappaisgod] * 1
    #16194752 - 05/07/12 02:57 PM (1 year, 12 days ago)

People are desperate to be anything but white.  Makes sense with all the blame, guilt and cultural self-deprecation that white families generally carry on.  Kids dont want to be part of that, they don't get the twisted self satisfaction that the adults get from it.  So kids often fixate on and embellish any non-white heritage they have and then form their identity around that as they go on into adulthood.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 42,253
Last seen: 2 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: Not Quite Social]
    #16195192 - 05/07/12 04:49 PM (1 year, 12 days ago)

Quote:

Not Quite Social said:


Anyway, lots of people recognize 1/32 Cherokee ancestry.  If it's in the mix, why not embrace it! :thumbup:




They can do whatever they want.  I'm part Passamaquoddy, according to family lore :grin:, but I sure as shit wouldn't ever check the minority box on any personal profile. 

So what is an acceptable threshold of blood before one can claim to be a minority for either Affirmative Action purposes or for establishing a politically correct institutional diversity level?  Is 1/64th enough?  1/128th?  Absurd.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offline4896744
Small Town Girl
Female User Gallery

Registered: 03/06/10
Posts: 5,128
Loc: United States
Last seen: 1 year, 4 days
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: zappaisgod]
    #16195293 - 05/07/12 05:05 PM (1 year, 12 days ago)

I would most definitely exploit the system if I had some evidence to back up a claim to a government preferred heritage.

Unfortunately, I am too European in decent.

People always seem eager to claim they are of foreign descent no matter how distant it is. It seems kind of silly as I can truthfully claim I am of African descent if I go back far enough.

My dad is from Poland, and my name is very European, but i still only claim to be American.


--------------------
Live your Life! :heart:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 42,253
Last seen: 2 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: 4896744]
    #16196293 - 05/07/12 08:38 PM (1 year, 12 days ago)

Quote:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/07/Faux-cohontas-Cherokee-No-Wantabe-Yes

Elizabeth Warren may claim that her great-great-great grandmother was Cherokee, but according to the Cherokee Nation, she is likely ineligible for membership. In fact, even if she had more than 1/32 Cherokee ancestry, the would-be U.S. Senator from Massachusetts likely cannot claim membership under the Cherokee Nation's strict rules.

The Washington Post ran an op-ed with the ultimate spinning title, “Elizabeth Warren says she’s Native American. So she is.” But she isn’t, and that's not how Native American identity ultimately works. An official source at the Cherokee Nation confirmed Thursday that Ms. Warren “would not under any circumstances qualify as a member of the Cherokee Nation” if she could not find an ancestor listed on the Dawes Roll, a census of Cherokee taken from 1899 to 1906.

Even if you can demonstrate by genealogy that your ancestors were Cherokee but did not sign the roll, you still cannot get in. “Anyone descended from the Cherokee [not listed on the Dawes Roll] will be unable to enroll in the Cherokee Nation, even if they are able to prove their Cherokee heritage,” writes Christina Berry at All Things Cherokee.

It would appear then that Warren, who claims to be 1/32 Cherokee solely on the basis of family history, cannot claim to be a member, and as Indian tribes, under federal law, have ultimate authority on who is--and who is not--a member of the tribe, Warren may be out of luck.

So strict are the rules that even if Warren’s own father were Cherokee but had descended from a group of Cherokee that had refused to sign the Dawes Roll, she could not qualify as a member. Ironically, the Roll, created by former Massachusetts senator Henry L. Dawes in 1893, was established to help the Cherokee assimilate into American life by giving them property and divvying up the reservation lands, not to keep them separate for the purposes of multiculturalism.

Fittingly, Dawes’s approach ultimately backfired, as white farmers moved in to try to exploit the land quotas reserved for Indians--something that Warren, who claims her Native American ancestry, might be able to relate to, if allegations that she traded on her "minority" status to gain a faculty position at Harvard Law School are true.

While the Warren campaign claims she would have received her tenure at Harvard Law on merit, it’s easy to be more than a little bit suspicious. Paul Bedard of the Washington Examiner notes that Warren’s forgery “likely played a role in her Harvard hiring.”

When compared to the academic pedigree of her colleagues at Harvard, she’s found lacking. Most professors at Harvard Law graduates from Harvard and all, but one graduated from the nation’s top 10 law schools—all that is, except for Warren, who graduated from Rutgers University in Newark, which is ranked 82nd by Top-Law-Schools.com.

In any event, to this day, several tribes--Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole—continue to use the Rolls to decide how to award tribal benefits, such as casino earnings or scholarships. The 300,000-strong Cherokee do not distribute casino earnings to its members, but they do award modest $1000 to $2000 scholarships to their members. In 2009, the tribe provided some 2,512 scholarships.

Did Warren receive such a scholarship? If not, why not? Had she been able to establish her Cherokee bona fides, she likely would have been eligible for such a scholarship. And if she were a member of the tribe, she could have enrolled in the Cherokee Nation’s single payer health care system--a system she apparently wants to foist upon the rest of us.

Perhaps Warren, who graduated from Rutgers in 1978, was part of a new wave of Americans self-identifying as Indian. According to Killing the White Man’s Indian (1996) by historian Fergus Bordewich:

    Between 1980 and 1990, the apparent number of Indians jumped by 78 percent in New Jersey, 66.1 percent in Ohio, 64 percent in Texas, 62 percent in Virginia, and 58.3 percent in New York. …In 1990, nearly 2 million Americans listed themselves as Indians in the U.S. Census. (54)

In 1978, Congress passed the American Religious Freedom Act, which uses a two-part definition of what constitutes an Indian. According to the act, an Indian is a person who belongs to an Indian Tribe and who “is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians.” Anything else is fake.

Warren doesn’t fit the definition, but she is, apparently, a member of what Kent Carter, director of the National Archives-Fort Worth Branch calls the largest tribe in America--the Wantabes.

Alternatively, Warren may be a member of the second largest Native American tribe, the Outalucks. It’ll be up to voters in Massachusetts to decide.





--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleNot Quite Social
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/16/10
Posts: 1,336
Loc: Midwest
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: zappaisgod]
    #16196962 - 05/07/12 10:48 PM (1 year, 11 days ago)

I :heart: Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth Warren 2016


--------------------


The People's History


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinehockeyplyr1057
Music Lover
Male


Registered: 03/20/07
Posts: 546
Last seen: 14 days, 20 hours
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: zappaisgod]
    #16197263 - 05/07/12 11:45 PM (1 year, 11 days ago)

Quote:

zappaisgod said:

When are we going to stop with this identity nonsense and quotas?  The most hypocritical part of this is that Warren and Harvard engaged in self-serving nonsense even though they both ostensibly support Affirmative Action and racial diversity in hiring and admissions for real, bona fide minorities. 




This nonsense will end when codified racism (affirmative action) is taken out of the books. That shit only perpetuates racism (as well as big government's role in the workplace). Run for public office or something dude. You clearly know your shit better than a lot of people, regardless of whether or not I agree with your views. Many politicians don't know shit, you could easily give them a run for their money. But honestly, you are just like the rest of us who bitch online about shit. But you seem to have a brain upon your shoulders that could do something. Just my opinion.


--------------------
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us. -Gandalf


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblejohnm214M
Male User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 16,561
Loc: Americas
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: DieCommie]
    #16197988 - 05/08/12 02:51 AM (1 year, 11 days ago)

Quote:

DieCommie said:
People are desperate to be anything but white.  Makes sense with all the blame, guilt and cultural self-deprecation that white families generally carry on.  Kids dont want to be part of that, they don't get the twisted self satisfaction that the adults get from it.  So kids often fixate on and embellish any non-white heritage they have and then form their identity around that as they go on into adulthood.





Plus, if you happened to have gone through a school system where your grades and ratings were not much related to your performance but were instead a product of what your teacher presumed your life was like, the advantages you had, and so on- you learn quickly that you need to scramble for a downtroden/victim of circumstances status.

That was most of my education in public school, honestly.  Was quite a shock when I got the college and all that bullshit disappeared (at least in my science classes).  No social engineering, no deciding I had better advantages than other students because I wore better clothes, none of that crap.  Either you had a correct answer, could do the problem, or you couldn't.


Public education is run in many cases like a socialist enterprise, and its particularly troubling that the people they hire as teachers don't need to know a damn thing about what they're teaching.  How did a master's/bachelor's in education somehow get considered sufficient education for teaching high school science?  They'd be better off hiring college drop outs with two or three semesters of the respective science class and having them teach the class- I'm not at all kidding.  Even the people who get specific training for secondary school chemistry at my university take less chemistry classes than I did after my first year.  Its absurd.  (that these people are advising high school students about college is pretty scary- I can't count the amount of idiotic descriptions of college coursework I was told in high school)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinefireworks_godS
SexyButt McDanger
Male


Registered: 03/12/02
Posts: 24,189
Loc: Red Panda Village
Last seen: 5 hours, 21 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: Not Quite Social]
    #16198087 - 05/08/12 03:39 AM (1 year, 11 days ago)

Quote:

Not Quite Social said:
  As it turns out, when you deconstruct and apply common sense to a joke you excise the humor.




Oh, I see! You were joking. That was a joke. You made a funny!
Strangely enough, even now your comment and the way in which it was delivered doesn't register in the slightest as humor for me... Maybe I have a broken funny bone? :confused:


--------------------

:redpanda:
If I should die this very moment
I wouldn't fear
For I've never known completeness
Like being here
Wrapped in the warmth of you
Loving every breath of you

:heartpump: :bunnyhug: :yinyang:

:yinyang: :levitate: :earth: :levitate: :yinyang:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 42,253
Last seen: 2 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: hockeyplyr1057]
    #16199061 - 05/08/12 11:26 AM (1 year, 11 days ago)

Quote:

hockeyplyr1057 said:
Quote:

zappaisgod said:

When are we going to stop with this identity nonsense and quotas?  The most hypocritical part of this is that Warren and Harvard engaged in self-serving nonsense even though they both ostensibly support Affirmative Action and racial diversity in hiring and admissions for real, bona fide minorities. 




This nonsense will end when codified racism (affirmative action) is taken out of the books. That shit only perpetuates racism (as well as big government's role in the workplace). Run for public office or something dude. You clearly know your shit better than a lot of people, regardless of whether or not I agree with your views. Many politicians don't know shit, you could easily give them a run for their money. But honestly, you are just like the rest of us who bitch online about shit. But you seem to have a brain upon your shoulders that could do something. Just my opinion.




There is no fucking way I would ever submit to the electoral colonoscopy.  It would ruin my life and ruin my family's life.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offline4896744
Small Town Girl
Female User Gallery

Registered: 03/06/10
Posts: 5,128
Loc: United States
Last seen: 1 year, 4 days
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: zappaisgod]
    #16199362 - 05/08/12 12:52 PM (1 year, 11 days ago)

Ya, fuck dedicating my life to trying to fix problems I inherited in vain.


--------------------
Live your Life! :heart:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 42,253
Last seen: 2 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: 4896744]
    #16199444 - 05/08/12 01:20 PM (1 year, 11 days ago)

If everybody concentrated on fixing their own lives we wouldn't need so many cocksucking community organizer parasites.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 42,253
Last seen: 2 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: zappaisgod]
    #16204582 - 05/09/12 02:30 PM (1 year, 10 days ago)

We may not be able to ascertain that she has Cherk blood but it seems we can be certain that the husband of the alleged Cherk was involved in the round up.

http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/05/cruel-irony-in-elizabeth-warrens-cherokee-saga/

Quote:

In what may be the ultimate and cruelest irony, not only is it unlikely that Elizabeth Warren’s great-great-great grandmother was Cherokee, it turns out that Warren’s great-great-great grandfather was a member of a militia unit which participated in the round-up of the Cherokees in the prelude to the Trail of Tears.

The evidence resulted from a tip provided by a Legal Insurrection reader to a genealogical compilation of militia members who allegedly participated in the removal of the Cherokees from Georgia.  The list included the name Jonathan Crawford, who was the husband of O.C. Sarah Smith, the person the Warren campaign has identified as Warren’s great-great-great grandmother and allegedly Cherokee.

Since confirming this genealogical information was outside my comfort zone, I forwarded the information to author and genealogist Michael Patrick Leahy, who already had written about and investigated Warren’s genealogy.

Leahy reaches the conclusion, based on a variety of sources, that Jonathan Crawford was indeed a member of the militia which rounded up Cherokees in the prelude to the Trail of Tears.




--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 42,253
Last seen: 2 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: zappaisgod]
    #16215507 - 05/11/12 04:43 PM (1 year, 8 days ago)

http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/05/genealogist-who-claimed-elizabeth-warren-was-132-cherokee-goes-silent-as-source-document-exposed-as-false/

Quote:

There is nothing left of the claim that Elizabeth Warren is 1/32 Cherokee.  The documentary sources have been debunked, and the genealogist and genealogical society which originated the story and upon whom the Warren campaign relies are not talking.




That's the concluding paragraph.  As they say, read the whole thing.  Apparently it was total bullshit from the get go.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 42,253
Last seen: 2 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Fauxcohontas and other liberal lies [Re: zappaisgod]
    #16215632 - 05/11/12 05:07 PM (1 year, 8 days ago)

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/11/hmmm-harvard-apparently-touted-elizabeth-warrens-status-as-a-native-american-in-the-new-york-times/
Quote:


Throughout the controversy over Elizabeth Warren’s claimed Native American ancestry, Warren has maintained she was unaware that Harvard Law School touted her heritage in defense of it’s diversity hiring practices in the 90′s. As reported by the Boston Herald, the Harvard student newspaper The Crimson published at least two contemporaneous articles on this topic which made reference to Elizabeth Warren as a Native American professor, in defense of the Law School. But it turns out this controversy generated ink in more than just the Harvard school paper: it also found it’s way into the New York Times.



Go to the link
Diversity mongers lying that they are diverse.  Just self righteous scum.  Just.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: < Back | 1 | 2  [ show all ]

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Harvard Study Concludes Media Biased Towards Democrats (What a Surprise!) lonestar2004 491 10 11/02/07 12:14 PM
by BrAiN
* Broken Cities: Liberalism?s Urban Legacy
( 1 2 all )
JesusChrist 1,137 27 05/16/05 10:11 PM
by Cervantes
* Why Some People Go Left: is liberalism in the genes?
( 1 2 all )
deCypher 1,065 31 02/19/11 01:14 AM
by CaptainCrunch
* elizabeth edwards dies...
Annapurna1
179 0 12/07/10 08:09 PM
by Annapurna1
* Confusing Occupation With Liberation Zahid 167 0 10/25/03 03:07 AM
by Zahid
* Liberal Democrats Have Destroyed The Black Community JesusChrist 655 5 08/05/04 03:53 PM
by JesusChrist
* Tired of liberals always shouting racism whenever someone doesn't agree with their agenda
( 1 2 3 all )
Simplicitry 2,092 58 05/22/10 02:44 PM
by Evolving
* Guns and Liberals
( 1 2 3 4 all )
luvdemshrooms 1,053 70 08/22/03 12:09 PM
by st0nedphucker

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Phred, Prisoner#1
968 topic views. 1 members, 1 guests and 0 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:
Lil Shop Of Spores
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2013 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.112 seconds spending 0.003 seconds on 19 queries.