|
 Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,343
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck 
|
|
Quote:
Alan Rockefeller said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
alan for instance believes that 9/11 was an
inside job, that it was explosives and nothing that I've said has changed
his mind but instead of acting like a fool he discussed his points and
debated mine and he and I get along fine, why? because he doesnt take a
debate personally, he sees it for what it is.
Actually that discussion changed my mind, after reevaluating the evidence I think 9/11 was done by arab hijackers and they likely didn't have any inside help.
keep reading up, the white house helped by asking the FBI to turn a blind
eye, there was a conspiracy involved. as I see it, it's better if the truth
is known instead of obscured by a bunch of crap which as hard as it is to
believe, certainly applies to what's happened in this thread. the paranoid
has obscured the truth with a bunch of crap, demands we believe it and
becomes insulting when we dont
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
Psychoslut
The Mother Fucking Bear-o-dactyl
Registered: 12/10/02
Posts: 20,115
Loc: all up in ya
|
 Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery  [Re: Prisoner#1]
#15971042 - 03/20/12 11:39 AM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
i thought you were always saying 9/11 was not an inside job?
--------------------
[quote]KristiMidocean said:
Good now thats clear.WHO FUCKING CARES. If I am fat u all keep pointing it out like its suppose to be a secret.LIke u really have nothing better to do then make fat jokes. If o know its like I do I know yall can come up with NEW AND BETTER SHIT . This shit is old and boring . I left in the first place cause this shit got boring not because of the fat jokes . Fat jokes dont bother me but seriously its old[/quote]
|
johnm214
Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 16,568
Loc: Americas
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: Psychoslut]
#15971154 - 03/20/12 12:12 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Not taking appropriate action against terrorist cells (especially Clinton) or following up on threats is not the same as planning and executing the attack itself. There is evidence for the former, the later there's nothing but 'number magic' and garbage science.
|
MaxFresh
I made this
Registered: 03/03/03
Posts: 71,835
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: zzripz] 7
#15972977 - 03/20/12 08:14 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
zzripz said:
I also must point out johnm214 that the vibes I get from ALL your posts are threatening, and full of vitriol. backed up by the powers of your mod status. So it it is a bit rich to claim I attack people all the time when your whole manner seems to me in attack-mode, and provocative.
I stopped reading your blatant slandering, pandering, and spreading of conspiracy theory rhetoric involving consortiums of shroomery moderator/administrator authority figures right goddamn here cause that's a flagrant lie. I talked to johnm214 a couple times and he was pretty cool, so you're lying like hell through your forked serpent tongue. He has more credibility to me than you do as well. If you ever make physical or legal threats against John again I will karate chop you in the face and sue your parents to death in the wallets and banks. I will pay off Nancy Grace to slander you in the medias, and Pat Robinson will make the elderly hate you. You are a carrier of dark forces.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,343
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: Psychoslut]
#15976016 - 03/21/12 01:24 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Psychoslut said:
i thought you were always saying 9/11 was not an inside job?
no, I always say it wasnt a controlled demolition, 9/11 was in inside job
terrorists INSIDE the airliners, flew them to the INSIDE of the towers and
the INSIDE of the pentagon, thus, 9/11 was an inside job... had these
jihadists decided to blow up the landscaping at the white house, that would
have been an outside job
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
Newbie
User of semicolons.
Registered: 07/18/04
Posts: 23,015
Loc: Suburbia
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: Prisoner#1]
#15976053 - 03/21/12 01:32 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
|
 questioneverything
joven fuerte
Registered: 12/11/11
Posts: 655
Last seen: 16 days, 19 hours
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: zzripz]
#15976068 - 03/21/12 01:35 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
zzripz said:
Look boys. The bottom line is this--let this remind you:
Quote:
Ad hominem
An ad hominem argument, or argumentum ad hominem (Latin, literally "argument against the man [or person]"), is a fallacy that involves replying to an argument or assertion by attempting to discredit the person offering the argument or assertion. Ad hominem rebuttals are one of the best-known of propagandist tactics.[why, like calling them "full of shit" or "schizophrenic who is on drugs"--ya know, stuff like that?]
Simply, it is a refutation of a proposition, based solely upon some unrelated fact about the person presenting the proposition. Such refutation is said to be "against the person" (ad hominem) and not their proposition. Properly, it consists of saying that an argument is wrong because of something about the individual or organization is in error rather than about the argument itself. Moreover, it is not necessary to insult the individual or organization whose argument is attacked in order to commit the ad hominem attack. Rather, it must be clear that the purpose of the characterization is to discredit the person offering the argument, and, specifically, to invite others to discount his arguments.[yeahhh, like for example 'hey you chaps. dont bother with this person people think he is full of shit'
Three traditionally identified varieties include:
Ad hominem abusive
Involves merely (and often unfairly) insulting the opponent.
Involve pointing out factual but damning character flaws or actions.
Insults and damaging facts simply do not undermine what logical support there might be for one's opponent's arguments or assertions.
Ad hominem circumstantial
Involves pointing out that someone is in circumstances such that he or she is disposed to take a particular position.
Constitutes an attack on the bias of a person.
Does not make one's opponent's arguments, from a logical point of view, any less credible to point out that one's opponent is disposed to argue that way.
Ad hominem tu quoque (literally, "at the person, you too")
Also called the "hypocrisy" argument.
Occurs when a claim is dismissed either because it is inconsistent with other claims which the claimant is making or because it is inconsistent with the claimant's actions.
As technique of propaganda, despite its usual lack of subtlety, it is powerful and frequently used (and, sometimes, excessively). Anyone involved in political discourse, and public discourse in general, would do well to become acquainted with it.
See also: fundamental attribution error
[emphasis mine]
Go study and get back to me. This thread has been exposure of what is going on. That is it---done.
and as for this little nuggest of scapegoatery:
Quote:
When someone gets on the bad side of the community and continues to act out, bringing the wrath of our more vocal members upon themselves and generally becoming a detriment to the health and harmony of the boards, they will be processed in accordance with the On Banning guidelines above. Even if you feel that you are in the right, sometimes it is best to just let things go. It is expected that you will respect any such direction given to you by a staff member.
I bet you a fiver that EVERY one who has supported you mr prisoner in this thread, all 5 or 6 of them all support your worldview> That is what is going on. Not ALL the Shroomery community. LOL
I have said my piece and feel I have made things clear. If I am not unfairly banned again, I do not expect fair moderation and will not ever make a complaint again against person attack, because there is absolutely no point and will just ignore them.
yeah i'm with you zzripz. not ALL the shroomery community is mad at you for having a different than *official* worldview. i'm gonna cry a river about it one day.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,343
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: Newbie]
#15976069 - 03/21/12 01:35 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
MaxFresh
I made this
Registered: 03/03/03
Posts: 71,835
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: Prisoner#1]
#15976187 - 03/21/12 02:10 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
WAF is probably my #2 or #3 favorite forum.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 24,810
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: MaxFresh]
#15976192 - 03/21/12 02:12 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
The frequent whining has made it a "must".
--------------------
“In politics, few talents are as richly rewarded as the ability to convince parasites that they are victims. Welfare states on both sides of the Atlantic have discovered that largesse to losers does not reduce their hostility to society, but only increases it. Far from producing gratitude, generosity is seen as an admission of guilt, and the reparations as inadequate compensation for injustices – leading to worsening behavior by the recipients.
Thomas Sowell
|
MaxFresh
I made this
Registered: 03/03/03
Posts: 71,835
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: luvdemshrooms]
#15976786 - 03/21/12 04:45 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Oh, personally, I just try to help others solve their problems is all.
|
Az0th
quantum transfiguration
Registered: 02/13/00
Posts: 53,449
Loc: The Void
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: zzripz] 2
#15979557 - 03/22/12 04:30 AM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
You sound just like hundreds of other entitlement babies I deal with every day.
You have not proven your case. You've been owned 50 times in this thread. And still you cry about some non-existent issue in your head. Just stop.
--------------------
~Thought Creates Reality~
|
Visionary Tools
I <3 Thomas Jefferson
Registered: 06/23/07
Posts: 6,740
Last seen: 8 hours, 3 minutes
|
|
Quote:
questioneverything said:
Quote:
zzripz said:
Look boys. The bottom line is this--let this remind you:
Quote:
Ad hominem
An ad hominem argument, or argumentum ad hominem (Latin, literally "argument against the man [or person]"), is a fallacy that involves replying to an argument or assertion by attempting to discredit the person offering the argument or assertion. Ad hominem rebuttals are one of the best-known of propagandist tactics.[why, like calling them "full of shit" or "schizophrenic who is on drugs"--ya know, stuff like that?]
Simply, it is a refutation of a proposition, based solely upon some unrelated fact about the person presenting the proposition. Such refutation is said to be "against the person" (ad hominem) and not their proposition. Properly, it consists of saying that an argument is wrong because of something about the individual or organization is in error rather than about the argument itself. Moreover, it is not necessary to insult the individual or organization whose argument is attacked in order to commit the ad hominem attack. Rather, it must be clear that the purpose of the characterization is to discredit the person offering the argument, and, specifically, to invite others to discount his arguments.[yeahhh, like for example 'hey you chaps. dont bother with this person people think he is full of shit'
Three traditionally identified varieties include:
Ad hominem abusive
Involves merely (and often unfairly) insulting the opponent.
Involve pointing out factual but damning character flaws or actions.
Insults and damaging facts simply do not undermine what logical support there might be for one's opponent's arguments or assertions.
Ad hominem circumstantial
Involves pointing out that someone is in circumstances such that he or she is disposed to take a particular position.
Constitutes an attack on the bias of a person.
Does not make one's opponent's arguments, from a logical point of view, any less credible to point out that one's opponent is disposed to argue that way.
Ad hominem tu quoque (literally, "at the person, you too")
Also called the "hypocrisy" argument.
Occurs when a claim is dismissed either because it is inconsistent with other claims which the claimant is making or because it is inconsistent with the claimant's actions.
As technique of propaganda, despite its usual lack of subtlety, it is powerful and frequently used (and, sometimes, excessively). Anyone involved in political discourse, and public discourse in general, would do well to become acquainted with it.
See also: fundamental attribution error
[emphasis mine]
Go study and get back to me. This thread has been exposure of what is going on. That is it---done.
and as for this little nuggest of scapegoatery:
Quote:
When someone gets on the bad side of the community and continues to act out, bringing the wrath of our more vocal members upon themselves and generally becoming a detriment to the health and harmony of the boards, they will be processed in accordance with the On Banning guidelines above. Even if you feel that you are in the right, sometimes it is best to just let things go. It is expected that you will respect any such direction given to you by a staff member.
I bet you a fiver that EVERY one who has supported you mr prisoner in this thread, all 5 or 6 of them all support your worldview> That is what is going on. Not ALL the Shroomery community. LOL
I have said my piece and feel I have made things clear. If I am not unfairly banned again, I do not expect fair moderation and will not ever make a complaint again against person attack, because there is absolutely no point and will just ignore them.
yeah i'm with you zzripz. not ALL the shroomery community is mad at you for having a different than *official* worldview. i'm gonna cry a river about it one day.
thing is, shroomery is a club. You observe what the other club members do, and balance off stepping on peoples toes, asserting yourself, or dropping your balls off at the door and sucking arse.
Personally I don't go in for that brown nosing shit. The only person I speak up for is Wiccan Seeker because his tek's and advice are one of the reasons I keep coming back here.
That and the 5am thread in SA.
I won't expect any sympathy. Now, part of me says I should just make this a pm and send you my sympathies cos I do like your insights. But, might as well have it in the open. Any club will close ranks on their members. People used to complain in prison about how screws would beat the shit out of prisoners, break their arms, and yes, sometimes they'd get nicked for it, but the system always closes ranks, always lets them get away with stuff you couldn't get away with.
Now, you can fight it, say it's not fair, recognise that the nail that sticks out gets hammered down, or, be like the river. Flow past it. Ignore the provocation and just carry on being yourself.
Reality is all about perception and my perception is, this place is really not that big a deal. It's just somewhere I come to talk about shit when mates aren't around and to feel the pulse of the junkies.
--------------------
Wiccan_Seeker said:
slide down a pole than with your legs spread and using your pussy as a brake. Ask the fire department 
|
novum
crap game
Registered: 03/04/06
Posts: 25,094
Loc: the city of dis
Last seen: 9 hours, 9 minutes
|
|
all this thread needs is some ron paul and a complaint about the forum lagging and it will be a perfect microcosm of the shroomery
|
Cutless
Admimistrator
Registered: 08/04/08
Posts: 2,822
Loc: 127.0.0.1
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: novum]
#15985609 - 03/23/12 02:06 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 20,134
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: Cutless]
#15985801 - 03/23/12 02:54 PM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
I tried to view this thread 3 times today, but it was only after the OTD $&tards signed off that I could get through to the antique hardware on which the site resides 
|
Acidic_Sloth
Acidic poly-Sided Di-slothamide
Registered: 05/29/02
Posts: 39,495
Loc: ainrofilac
|
 Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: koraks]
#15992315 - 03/25/12 02:45 AM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
eeeeee!!
so much love.
--------------------
-- Accept my heart warming gift of TREE SCRATCHIES!!! I absolve thee!! --
JaP: 30,000 lines of gay, cock, and fag can't be wrong
Ped: only in #shroomery is "smuggle opium in her ass" followed by "i don't want shitty opium" which is followed by " *** Joins: PENISSQUAD"
--
JaP: What would this place be without random sluts?
JaP: Nothing, I tell you.
 
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,343
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: Acidic_Sloth]
#15992443 - 03/25/12 03:27 AM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
Acidic_Sloth
Acidic poly-Sided Di-slothamide
Registered: 05/29/02
Posts: 39,495
Loc: ainrofilac
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: Prisoner#1]
#15992805 - 03/25/12 07:37 AM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
i just gave it a little more cowbell.
i should be sleeping.
--------------------
-- Accept my heart warming gift of TREE SCRATCHIES!!! I absolve thee!! --
JaP: 30,000 lines of gay, cock, and fag can't be wrong
Ped: only in #shroomery is "smuggle opium in her ass" followed by "i don't want shitty opium" which is followed by " *** Joins: PENISSQUAD"
--
JaP: What would this place be without random sluts?
JaP: Nothing, I tell you.
|
Visionary Tools
I <3 Thomas Jefferson
Registered: 06/23/07
Posts: 6,740
Last seen: 8 hours, 3 minutes
|
Re: BIAS and private insults at the Shroomery [Re: Cutless]
#15992879 - 03/25/12 08:29 AM (1 year, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Cutless said:
OMG did you guys see, Johnathan Davis from Korn is now endorsing Ron Paul!!1
http://www.politico.com/blogs/click/2012/03/korn-frontman-wants-ron-paul-for-president-118287.html
I heard that Ron Paul wants to legalise freedom.
I like the idea of this freedom. Has anyone lemon tek'd it?
--------------------
Wiccan_Seeker said:
slide down a pole than with your legs spread and using your pussy as a brake. Ask the fire department
|
|
Images only 
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Edit 
Reply 
Anonymous
