|
Anonymous #1
|
Questions about NSA sex
#15919834 - 03/08/12 04:10 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Its just not possible for me, I cannot be intimate with someone without falling for them, so I spend a lot of time on my own, because it seems to me, that most people are hell bent on having a good time without becoming attached...as if it is an option...it probably is, for them, and that is why I am starting this thread.
Are you one of them? Please feel free to share in here how you manage to do it, without becoming attached to the other person or wanting something more with them. Is there a system to your thinking? when did you first know that this was something you could, perhaps preferred, or liked doing?
If you dont feel a sense of attachment, or desire for a more commited connection with the other person, what is it you do feel instead? Does it affect your sensual experience?
For me personally, I always thought the reason I cant do it is because my orgasms are so intense causing an immediate and strong attachment to the person I have them with....but then, that cant mean that people who have NSA sex dont have intense orgasms can it?...I dont think it does, I think we all experience things differently, but I would be interested in your thoughts.
Really interested to hear whatever you want to share in this topic, I am kind of happy the way I am, but I do wonder what it would be like to be able to have NSA sex. I mean, is it an attitude you have to learn or is it hereditary?
Cheers
|
Anonymous #2
|
|
I'm with you, I've always found the whole concept impossible. For me I just wouldn't want to have sex with someone I don't trust, and it takes getting to know someone to find out if they are honest. NSA is just a euphemism for desperate to me. Desperation, passion, sometimes I can't even tell them apart, but they are strings in themselves.
|
pwnasaurus
Stranger



Registered: 07/16/08
Posts: 8,317
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 44 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said: I'm with you, I've always found the whole concept impossible. For me I just wouldn't want to have sex with someone I don't trust, and it takes getting to know someone to find out if they are honest. NSA is just a euphemism for desperate to me. Desperation, passion, sometimes I can't even tell them apart, but they are strings in themselves.
What? Can you try and explain that, cause it makes absolutely no sense to me.
Right now, I am not in a relationship. I am planning on moving in the near future, and I'm not sure what lies in ahead, and I want to travel this summer, and definitely am going to be single during that time. For that reason, there is no way I am getting into any sort of relationship right now.
I have not had sex in months, and I am absolutely down - I don't go out spending my nights searching for "pussy", but if a cool chick comes along, I'm more than down to get it on. Sex feels good. How is that desperate?
|
Anonymous #2
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: pwnasaurus]
#15920477 - 03/08/12 06:15 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
What I'm saying is that I am not going to feel comfortable having sex with a person I don't have some sort of trusting relationsip with, it is just the way I am wired. If I get to know someone well enough to want to have sex with them, there will be some form of connection between us beyond physical pleasure, I wouldn't call that NSA sex even if we are not in a typical 1 man, 1 woman, commit to mating-for-life sceneraio.
I'm not saying this is the way it has to be for everybody, I certainly cared a lot less about a person's character when I was younger.
Sex is pleasurable but it comes along with certain risks, the label NSA seems to disregard these risks.
|
Anonymous #1
|
|
So 2, are you saying that you could have a non commited unmonogamous sexual relationship with someone, though it would still need to have some meaning and trust?
If this is the case, what is the essence of that meaning and trust, if it does not contain a committed connection?
I am not asking in rhetoric, I genuinely hope that there is an answer.
|
Deekay



Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 3,146
Loc:
Last seen: 19 hours, 48 minutes
|
|
There's always some attachment with sex. Hence why said people decided to have sex in the first place, it's not unnatural. I have a harder time climaxing with NSA partners personally, but whatever. Getting my partner off gets me off.
|
Anonymous #2
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said: So 2, are you saying that you could have a non commited unmonogamous sexual relationship with someone, though it would still need to have some meaning and trust?
Yes.
Quote:
If this is the case, what is the essence of that meaning and trust, if it does not contain a committed connection?
I think everything in life has meaning, or nothing does. I don't try and convince myself or anyone else that some of my actions are meaningless because they don't mesh well with my self-image and I "didn't mean it".
The essence of trust: I dunno, guess it is the ability to come across as a genuine person I can feel like I understand. I don't want to have to lie, I don't want to be lied to or emotionally manipulated for selfish reasons, I am willing to have less sex in order to ensure these things.
I don't always feel like this, I am human, but in general this is how I feel as of late.
|
jboredone
Money-The root of all evil....



Registered: 01/19/12
Posts: 1,991
|
|
-------------------- Peace Pot Micro-Dot God Loves You High or Not!!!
In order to grow old and wise, you must once have been young and dumb!
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/17320755
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/17320443/page/2
|
CounterCulturest
-Positive Mental Attitude-


Registered: 01/18/10
Posts: 3,095
Loc: At yo door Nigga
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: jboredone]
#15927646 - 03/10/12 02:10 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Man I actually tried this for the first time. Im 23 now and before the past couple of months I was just not interested in the aimless sex. I'm down for it, just for myself. Not cut out for it.
So I said fuck it and started sleeping with this girl. It's already causing problems. I made it clear that I didn't want anything REMOTELY serious and she is already getting way to attached. Constantly harping on me...
If you don't feel like you aren't mean to have aimless sex, then don't do it.
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
|
I can't have sex with people I am not attached to for one simple reason:
By engaging in the act of procreation with someone, I am letting them know they are in some way worthy of impregnating me. Of course not literally impregnate, but that is the most basic meaning behind sex. I am allowing them to think they are worthy of mixing their DNA with my own. It's an ego boost of sorts. Most people, in my eyes, are not worthy of such an ego boost. They don't deserve to think they are worthy males because they're not. So why should I lower my standards just so I can feel the sensations of sex when I wouldn't even want the person I am fucking. Being attractive isn't what I am attracted to, anyway. I need someone to be intellectual, motivated, and interesting. If someone isn't, I literally can't get wet. I can't allow myself to let such a person penetrate me.
And so, I tend to only have intimate relationships with someone who has enough likeable traits that I *could* date them or want to, but won't for whatever reasons. Main reasons being that I don't need a relationship atm and it's a rare for to find attractive men who can handle a FWB. Because of this, the amount of people I've had sex with is pretty fucking low. Especially when compared to other women my age.
I'll probably get criticized for this but
|
Butt-Head
Drizzle



Registered: 05/01/11
Posts: 3,625
Loc: Enceladus
Last seen: 4 hours, 21 minutes
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15928643 - 03/10/12 10:22 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: I can't have sex with people I am not attached to for one simple reason:
By engaging in the act of procreation with someone, I am letting them know they are in some way worthy of impregnating me. Of course not literally impregnate, but that is the most basic meaning behind sex. I am allowing them to think they are worthy of mixing their DNA with my own. It's an ego boost of sorts. Most people, in my eyes, are not worthy of such an ego boost. They don't deserve to think they are worthy males because they're not. So why should I lower my standards just so I can feel the sensations of sex when I wouldn't even want the person I am fucking. Being attractive isn't what I am attracted to, anyway. I need someone to be intellectual, motivated, and interesting. If someone isn't, I literally can't get wet. I can't allow myself to let such a person penetrate me.
And so, I tend to only have intimate relationships with someone who has enough likeable traits that I *could* date them or want to, but won't for whatever reasons. Main reasons being that I don't need a relationship atm and it's a rare for to find attractive men who can handle a FWB. Because of this, the amount of people I've had sex with is pretty fucking low. Especially when compared to other women my age.
I'll probably get criticized for this but 
I wish I had a girl like you I cant wait to have a family
--------------------
  
"Cause I've got more rhymes than Carl Sagan's got turtlenecks"
Free Spore Ring Canada
|
Anonymous #1
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15928654 - 03/10/12 10:29 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
edit: removal of emotional rants with embarressing details.
Edited by Anonymous (03/10/12 10:42 AM)
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
|
One thing that helps is not talking about it and not allowing your mind to spend any amount of time sweating it.
Go fucking masturbate for fucks sake.
|
Anonymous #1
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15928679 - 03/10/12 10:39 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I have but thanks anyway.
Edited by Anonymous (03/10/12 10:48 AM)
|
greys
Mushroom Dork



Registered: 07/16/06
Posts: 37,370
Loc: nunya
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15928859 - 03/10/12 12:03 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: I can't have sex with people I am not attached to for one simple reason:
By engaging in the act of procreation with someone, I am letting them know they are in some way worthy of impregnating me. Of course not literally impregnate, but that is the most basic meaning behind sex. I am allowing them to think they are worthy of mixing their DNA with my own. It's an ego boost of sorts. Most people, in my eyes, are not worthy of such an ego boost. They don't deserve to think they are worthy males because they're not. So why should I lower my standards just so I can feel the sensations of sex when I wouldn't even want the person I am fucking. Being attractive isn't what I am attracted to, anyway. I need someone to be intellectual, motivated, and interesting. If someone isn't, I literally can't get wet. I can't allow myself to let such a person penetrate me.
And so, I tend to only have intimate relationships with someone who has enough likeable traits that I *could* date them or want to, but won't for whatever reasons. Main reasons being that I don't need a relationship atm and it's a rare for to find attractive men who can handle a FWB. Because of this, the amount of people I've had sex with is pretty fucking low. Especially when compared to other women my age.
I'll probably get criticized for this but 
You and Xul should get together and spend hours over analyzing stuff.
Also...you have a subliminated imsemination/impregnation fantasy.
|
Deekay



Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 3,146
Loc:
Last seen: 19 hours, 48 minutes
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15928863 - 03/10/12 12:04 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
That was far from one simple reason  No offense but that sounds pretty kooky to me  The whole point of NSA sex is that you don't have to worry about that sort of nonsense. If it becomes an issue for you cut it off. The point is just to enjoy each other for a bit. As for the ego boost thing, if it's NSA why feel bad about making someone feel good for a little.
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: greys]
#15928944 - 03/10/12 12:39 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Clearly you totally don't understand my perspective at all. Most people don't... heh
Quite simply: I dislike most people so the thought of letting someone who irritates me get off from intimacy with me is kind of nauseating. And so, I refrain from pursuing such encounters. They do nothing for my long term happiness, are a major waste of energy and don't give back nearly enough to be considered worthwhile. I try not to be a simple, hedonistic beast.
Quote:
greysRDbest said:
Quote:
TTT said: I can't have sex with people I am not attached to for one simple reason:
By engaging in the act of procreation with someone, I am letting them know they are in some way worthy of impregnating me. Of course not literally impregnate, but that is the most basic meaning behind sex. I am allowing them to think they are worthy of mixing their DNA with my own. It's an ego boost of sorts. Most people, in my eyes, are not worthy of such an ego boost. They don't deserve to think they are worthy males because they're not. So why should I lower my standards just so I can feel the sensations of sex when I wouldn't even want the person I am fucking. Being attractive isn't what I am attracted to, anyway. I need someone to be intellectual, motivated, and interesting. If someone isn't, I literally can't get wet. I can't allow myself to let such a person penetrate me.
And so, I tend to only have intimate relationships with someone who has enough likeable traits that I *could* date them or want to, but won't for whatever reasons. Main reasons being that I don't need a relationship atm and it's a rare for to find attractive men who can handle a FWB. Because of this, the amount of people I've had sex with is pretty fucking low. Especially when compared to other women my age.
I'll probably get criticized for this but 
You and Xul should get together and spend hours over analyzing stuff.
Also...you have a subliminated imsemination/impregnation fantasy.
People with XUL's personality are extremely far from being attractive to me. I may over analyze things, but I feel it makes me a bit more grounded with reality than most. There really isn't anything I said in my explanation that is invalid... please tell me if there is. Especially since most of it, besides the beginning, is opinion. I tend to be bothered by people who don't analyze things enough. Most of the problems in this world are caused by people not thinking things through enough and acting on impulses that yield a short term gain but do nothing for the bigger picture. Humans often look at things through such a narrow lens. Me me me, pleasure, pleasure, materials, profit, social status, instant gratification, bullshit. Fuck that. The purpose of life is efficiency and being able to adapt. Part of my way of maintaining efficiency is not wasting an ounce of my energy on human relationships that will never be lasting. I'd rather learn.
I'm not even sure why I bothered to respond.
Edited by TTT (03/10/12 12:47 PM)
|
Deekay



Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 3,146
Loc:
Last seen: 19 hours, 48 minutes
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15929030 - 03/10/12 01:16 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
I dislike most people so the thought of letting someone who irritates me get off from intimacy with me is kind of nauseating. And so, I refrain from pursuing such encounters.
So, don't have sex with people who irritate you? No where does it say you have to have NSA with jerks. If you refrain from these encounters how do you know they're not worthwhile? Also, sex doesn't make you a hedonistic beast. All relationships last, just in varying amounts of time. If you took the time I'm sure you could learn something, from the weekend fling to the year relationship.
|
Anonymous #1
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: Deekay]
#15929070 - 03/10/12 01:31 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Deekay said:
So, don't have sex with people who irritate you? No where does it say you have to have NSA with jerks. If you refrain from these encounters how do you know they're not worthwhile? Also, sex doesn't make you a hedonistic beast. All relationships last, just in varying amounts of time. If you took the time I'm sure you could learn something, from the weekend fling to the year relationship.
Speaking for my situation. People who do not irritate me, usually dont show any sign of interest. And when they do, I fear becoming emotionally attached, that is what my thread is about. If the person isnt irritating, then why is it you dont want more from them? that you prefer no strings...what is the difference?
I wonder if it is hereditary.
Perhaps it is a security thing. Perhaps people who can do nsa like this have a stronger sense of self worth, and therefore it doesnt matter to them who they go with because it doesnt threaten their self esteem.
?
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: Deekay]
#15929335 - 03/10/12 03:08 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Deekay said:
Quote:
I dislike most people so the thought of letting someone who irritates me get off from intimacy with me is kind of nauseating. And so, I refrain from pursuing such encounters.
1) So, don't have sex with people who irritate you? No where does it say you have to have NSA with jerks. 2) If you refrain from these encounters how do you know they're not worthwhile? 3) Also, sex doesn't make you a hedonistic beast. All relationships last, just in varying amounts of time. If you took the time I'm sure you could learn something, from the weekend fling to the year relationship.
1) That is exactly why I don't do the whole "NSA". Most people irritate me. I explained it quite clearly. I am very capable of having NSA flings, but few people interest me enough.
2) When I was younger, I tried to push myself to experience a wide range of things. One of those things was casual hook ups. I could never do it for the reasons I detailed.
Also, I watch people. I learn from other people's mistakes and experiences. Through my observations in watching people waste tremendous time and energy feeling feelings that lead no where and exhaust their spirits, hamper their drive and distract their minds, I've determined most casual flings are not worth my time. Most people in general are not worth my time.
3) If it is for purely pleasure and I have no feelings what so ever for the person, then yes it does make you a pleasure seeking animal who requires no complexity to a relationship before engaging in sexual acts.
I suppose I get more pleasure out of bettering myself, learning, and experiencing life in this wonderful vessel that is me. Don't get me wrong, I fucking love sex and have a pretty ridiculous sex drive. I can control it though and prefer to spend my time thinking about real things, not sex with people I don't truly care about. When I am in a relationship, I am pretty demanding of sex and like A LOT of stuff.
Also, when I say learn, I mean dedicate myself to science. I am into why things work they way they do, not people.
I've had a relationship before. I have had flings before. I also covered that in my explanation. Learn to read.
I have trouble becoming emotionally attached to people, so fear of attachment has never been a concern for me. Usually people I've hooked up with became overly infatuated with me. I can have flings with people but I can't get aroused unless they possess enough likeable traits that it would pretty much qualify them for a relationship. This is rare as fuck which is why I've slept with very few people. Therefore, I don't pursue hook ups because very few people are likeable in the first place...in anyway. I spend most of my time a lone and I am quite happy with that. Why would I try looking for casual sex when I could be reading, making music, listening to music or doing something physically satisfying like skateboarding, biking, walking, skimboarding or swimming?
My hand functions better than most men anyway. If anything, I have an over inflated sense of self worth when it comes to dealing with most people I come across. So, perhaps your problem OP is that you have low self esteem and get easily attached to people.
Edited by TTT (03/10/12 03:21 PM)
|
pwnasaurus
Stranger



Registered: 07/16/08
Posts: 8,317
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 44 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said:
Quote:
Deekay said:
So, don't have sex with people who irritate you? No where does it say you have to have NSA with jerks. If you refrain from these encounters how do you know they're not worthwhile? Also, sex doesn't make you a hedonistic beast. All relationships last, just in varying amounts of time. If you took the time I'm sure you could learn something, from the weekend fling to the year relationship.
Speaking for my situation. People who do not irritate me, usually dont show any sign of interest. And when they do, I fear becoming emotionally attached, that is what my thread is about. If the person isnt irritating, then why is it you dont want more from them? that you prefer no strings...what is the difference?
I wonder if it is hereditary.
Perhaps it is a security thing. Perhaps people who can do nsa like this have a stronger sense of self worth, and therefore it doesnt matter to them who they go with because it doesnt threaten their self esteem.
?
I already outlined a number of reasons why I don't want a relationship right now. That is why. I would not have sex with someone I don't like, because that would not be fun. To me, the emotional connection in sex is just as important as the physical connection.
Because of my current future plans, I don't want a relationship, but I still want to have sex with people I like. Is that such a hard concept to understand?
|
Anonymous #2
|
|
Quote:
Perhaps people who can do nsa like this have a stronger sense of self worth, and therefore it doesnt matter to them who they go with because it doesnt threaten their self esteem.
Never heard that one before I think conventional wisdom teaches the opposite and I tend to agree. Some people derive alot of self worth from the amount of sex they are having, just the fact that they are having sex with another is automatically a good thing, not the case for everyone.
Maybe I just take the term to literally, but sometimes I think people seem to be in denial about the fact that we are known to become attached to things we fuck often.
|
pwnasaurus
Stranger



Registered: 07/16/08
Posts: 8,317
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 44 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said:
Quote:
Perhaps people who can do nsa like this have a stronger sense of self worth, and therefore it doesnt matter to them who they go with because it doesnt threaten their self esteem.
Never heard that one before I think conventional wisdom teaches the opposite and I tend to agree. Some people derive alot of self worth from the amount of sex they are having, just the fact that they are having sex with another is automatically a good thing, not the case for everyone.
Maybe I just take the term to literally, but sometimes I think people seem to be in denial about the fact that we are known to become attached to things we fuck often.
Or you know, instead of over-analyzing things, you could just accept that people enjoy having sex...
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: pwnasaurus]
#15930102 - 03/10/12 06:43 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Thats kind of obvious...
Some people don't enjoy having sex unless there is an emotional connection first. Is that not also obvious?
|
pwnasaurus
Stranger



Registered: 07/16/08
Posts: 8,317
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 44 minutes
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15930177 - 03/10/12 07:05 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: Thats kind of obvious...
Some people don't enjoy having sex unless there is an emotional connection first. Is that not also obvious?
I'm not the one saying I don't understand the other viewpoint. I get both sides. I'm trying to explain the other one to him.
|
greys
Mushroom Dork



Registered: 07/16/06
Posts: 37,370
Loc: nunya
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15930183 - 03/10/12 07:07 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Sometimes it IS just a pipe though.
And once in awhile, bumping uglies just cause you can is ok too.
If you make every encounter about depth and onesness...no encounter will have depth and oneness.
In addition to the repressed impregnation fantasy, youre a perfectionist with an oral fixation.
hot.
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/07/06
Posts: 3,516
Last seen: 41 seconds
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15930315 - 03/10/12 07:43 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: Thats kind of obvious...
Some people don't enjoy having sex unless there is an emotional connection first. Is that not also obvious?
Don't enjoy sex, maybe they are doing it wrong? Emotional connection is overrated, it's all about being attracted to your sexual mate. If every sexual encounter needed a special emotional connection, we would have a very small human population.
|
Anonymous #1
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: qman]
#15930427 - 03/10/12 08:19 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Well, my point in this thread is that for me, the sex increases my attraction, which strengthens my emotional attachment which prevents me from being able to have a fuck buddy or nsa sex.
Using your style of premise, if it was simply about physical attraction, then monogomy would be virtually unheard of....would it not?
|
Anonymous #2
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: qman]
#15931151 - 03/10/12 11:22 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said: Don't enjoy sex, maybe they are doing it wrong? Emotional connection is overrated, it's all about being attracted to your sexual mate. If every sexual encounter needed a special emotional connection, we would have a very small human population.
Yeah, romance gets in the way of my orgasms, and the human population might stagnate if I stop jizzing in people.
|
CounterCulturest
-Positive Mental Attitude-


Registered: 01/18/10
Posts: 3,095
Loc: At yo door Nigga
|
|
I would certainly appreciate a smaller population. I bet in 40 years we all will lol.
|
Deekay



Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 3,146
Loc:
Last seen: 19 hours, 48 minutes
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: greys]
#15931340 - 03/11/12 12:10 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
greysRDbest said: Sometimes it IS just a pipe though.
And once in awhile, bumping uglies just cause you can is ok too.
If you make every encounter about depth and onesness...no encounter will have depth and oneness.
In addition to the repressed impregnation fantasy, youre a perfectionist with an oral fixation.
hot.

nice post 
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: qman]
#15932386 - 03/11/12 10:19 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said:
Quote:
TTT said: Thats kind of obvious...
Some people don't enjoy having sex unless there is an emotional connection first. Is that not also obvious?
Don't enjoy sex, maybe they are doing it wrong? Emotional connection is overrated, it's all about being attracted to your sexual mate. If every sexual encounter needed a special emotional connection, we would have a very small human population.
Pretty sure it's subjective. Just because emotional connections are "overrated" to you, does not mean others feel the same way. I am pretty sure you just validated one of my points with that last bit. To summarize that point: Humans tend to be short sighted with the end result of their actions when it is for a instant gratification. Whether its profit or sex, we tend to not think of the ramifications of our actions until its too late. We are currently facing that with our population. Yes, I overanalyze things but more people need to. My tendency to withdraw myself out of the picture and look at things objectively is why I am attracted to the field of study I am. I want to understand... same goes with people. It's just fewer people are complex or interesting enough to hold my attention and make me want them sexually.
greysRDbestS: I never said it wasn't ok, I just said I am too much of an elitist snob to let most males have sex with me. Even ones I am friends with, who are moderately attractive and I feel a level of comfort with rarely are able to remain attractive enough for me to become aroused in the first place. I have to be SMASHED for anything to occur. So I stopped seeking it. If you want to bang girls, I'll be your wing man but I am not looking for the same pleasures. I'll nerd out by myself and help hook it up (for my friends) with the few sane women I encounter. 
I'm not sure where you get your little theories of my repressed sexual fantasies but I assure you my love for oral is not really a repressed thing.... The only encounters I expect to have depth and oneness are sexual ones. I've been in a long term relationship and I preferred having a partner to explore things sexually and in daily life. It's my preference. Its not the purpose of my existence, though. I don't desire a family or marriage. I just want to focus on what I love: botany, microorganisms, fungi and the mechanics of life. Personal relationships are far from being important to me. I seek to have a deep, personal understanding of around me..not just humans. Humans are the problem in most cases.
Edited by TTT (03/11/12 10:30 AM)
|
greys
Mushroom Dork



Registered: 07/16/06
Posts: 37,370
Loc: nunya
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15933151 - 03/11/12 02:49 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Not desiring a family or children is a classic signature of the repressed impregnation fantasy.
|
Anonymous #3
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15933265 - 03/11/12 03:17 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: The only encounters I expect to have depth and oneness are sexual ones. I've been in a long term relationship and I preferred having a partner to explore things sexually and in daily life. It's my preference. Its not the purpose of my existence, though. I don't desire a family or marriage. I just want to focus on what I love: botany, microorganisms, fungi and the mechanics of life. Personal relationships are far from being important to me. I seek to have a deep, personal understanding of around me..not just humans. Humans are the problem in most cases.
As an “objective” scientist im sure you see that it is human nature to desire children/family as time goes on and you will almost inevitably follow suit eventually. I’m in no place to psychoanalyze anyone but I would guess that you haven’t had very many sexual partners and probably haven’t done much sexual exploring.
Quote:
TTT said: I need someone to be intellectual, motivated, and interesting. If someone isn't, I literally can't get wet. I can't allow myself to let such a person penetrate me.
I think you mean a *Pseudointellectual.. Like yourself. Someone with formal knowledge about the issues you have discussed here would likely offend you by punching holes in your extremely vague ideas about science and human nature.
Quote:
TTT said:
Most of the problems in this world are caused by people not thinking things through enough and acting on impulses that yield a short term gain but do nothing for the bigger picture. Humans often look at things through such a narrow lens. Me me me, pleasure, pleasure, materials, profit, social status, instant gratification, bullshit. Fuck that. The purpose of life is efficiency and being able to adapt. Part of my way of maintaining efficiency is not wasting an ounce of my energy on human relationships that will never be lasting. I'd rather learn.
This is juicy.. Tell me TTT: What else do you do to maintain efficiency and transcend man’s desire for materials and energy? “Humans” are the problem, but somehow you are not, id very much like to learn how you have achieved a lifestyle that doesn’t propagate the Earth-destroying machine known as man..
What field of science did you study again? Credentialed by Wikipedia I presume?
|
Anonymous #2
|
|
Quote:
Someone with formal knowledge about the issues you have discussed here would likely offend you by punching holes in your extremely vague ideas about science and human nature.
No, they'd probably be boring as hell and go around trashing others because they can't come up with their own ideas.
|
Anonymous #3
|
|
There is a difference between ideas that successfully satisfy a webpage full of young stoners and ideas that are actually applicable in the real world. *Real, innovative scientists impact your life more than you will ever understand; the tool you are using to interact with right now is brought to you by real scientists.
But whatever you have to tell yourself to validate your own “original” thinking is fine. Whatever pacifies you enough to be complacent in your little digital world, however hypocritical your views may be… Meanwhile, scientists are out in the world, actually trying to do something original.
|
Anonymous #2
|
|
You are making alot of assumptions here, not very scientific.
This is a discussion about a metaphorical label people put on sex and what it means to us personally. I like science but I don't think it really has a place in this discussion.
|
Anonymous #3
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said: I like science but I don't think it really has a place in this discussion.
Hmmm lets look at your contribution to the thread:
Quote:
Anonymous said: Yeah, romance gets in the way of my orgasms, and the human population might stagnate if I stop jizzing in people.

And yet you still probably don't feel like a hypocrite do you? Troll.
TTT was trying to validate her points by claiming to be analytical with a background in science, thus introducing the topic. I'm very curious about her background so I replied to her; you however, have nothing to do with anything.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 20,307
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said: Troll.
An anon user calling someone else a troll? With the kind of replies you have just posted on this page? Come on, don't make me laugh.
Please keep the debate polite.
Edited by koraks (03/11/12 04:46 PM)
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
|
blah not needed
Edited by TTT (03/11/12 11:04 PM)
|
Anonymous #2
|
|
I'm not a troll, I'm human and just being honest. I am a hypocrite in many ways, I've accepted that. If you want we can have an in-depth discussion of that.
I took her as saying that her primary interests in life involve sciences, and sex is not her priority. Nobody is trying to validate anything here, we are having a discussion on NSA sex.
Lots of well-known scientests had odd sexual habits that differed from the norm, they were still considered scientests despite the fact that they were not fully understood.
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/07/06
Posts: 3,516
Last seen: 41 seconds
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15934933 - 03/11/12 10:16 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said:
Quote:
Anonymous said:
Quote:
TTT said: The only encounters I expect to have depth and oneness are sexual ones. I've been in a long term relationship and I preferred having a partner to explore things sexually and in daily life. It's my preference. Its not the purpose of my existence, though. I don't desire a family or marriage. I just want to focus on what I love: botany, microorganisms, fungi and the mechanics of life. Personal relationships are far from being important to me. I seek to have a deep, personal understanding of around me..not just humans. Humans are the problem in most cases.
As an “objective” scientist im sure you see that it is human nature to desire children/family as time goes on and you will almost inevitably follow suit eventually. I’m in no place to psychoanalyze anyone but I would guess that you haven’t had very many sexual partners and probably haven’t done much sexual exploring.
Quote:
TTT said: I need someone to be intellectual, motivated, and interesting. If someone isn't, I literally can't get wet. I can't allow myself to let such a person penetrate me.
I think you mean a *Pseudointellectual.. Like yourself. Someone with formal knowledge about the issues you have discussed here would likely offend you by punching holes in your extremely vague ideas about science and human nature.
Quote:
TTT said:
Most of the problems in this world are caused by people not thinking things through enough and acting on impulses that yield a short term gain but do nothing for the bigger picture. Humans often look at things through such a narrow lens. Me me me, pleasure, pleasure, materials, profit, social status, instant gratification, bullshit. Fuck that. The purpose of life is efficiency and being able to adapt. Part of my way of maintaining efficiency is not wasting an ounce of my energy on human relationships that will never be lasting. I'd rather learn.
This is juicy.. Tell me TTT: What else do you do to maintain efficiency and transcend man’s desire for materials and energy? “Humans” are the problem, but somehow you are not, id very much like to learn how you have achieved a lifestyle that doesn’t propagate the Earth-destroying machine known as man..
What field of science did you study again? Credentialed by Wikipedia I presume?
I have not had any formal college education. I've been financially unable to and never graduated high school but did get a GED. My parents don't really help me with things. I've moved around a lot in my life and its made it difficult to begin classes. I plan on doing so this coming Spring. I read books, not Wikipedia. Sources I trust also include American Society of Plant Biologists, Royal Horticultural Society, Science magazine, as well as various university websites since many publish news bits on what they're doing. Sometimes I go through sciencedaily.com and physorg.com to find brief information on studies being carried out and then look at who is conducting it. All my books at home are text books and non-fiction books with recommendations from people I trust.
Currently, my lifestyle as it stands is part of the problem. And it certainly difficult to tackle. I am in the process of moving and will be learning about more sustainable, smaller level community agriculture and will hopefully get to become more involved with fungi growers.
Once I begin school, I have a plan for classes I want to take and the universities I'd like to study at in the future. I don't want to be a part of the problem anymore which is why I spend time a lone trying to learn as much as I can and teach myself about the fields involved in providing solutions. I have no tests to take, no assigned papers I have to work my ass of on, no lectures to listen to (except for the ones on youtube). It's just me reading and the little essays I type up for myself to summarize what I've read. Or section reviews in textbooks I've acquired. I certainly have a lot to learn and it is difficult when I know nobody who likes what I do. No one to tell me when I'm wrong or call me out on miswordings that could make one misinterpret information. I do the best I can with what I have. 
I never claimed to be an intellectual, I just am extremely attracted to very intelligent people. I would never be offended by someone punching holes in what I say! I actually would love that. How else would I learn? Having no proper education since I was 15 and getting most of my information from books and the few credible sources I find online, I know I am no where near as bright as I could be. But the whole reason I even want to wake up in the morning is to learn something new and find ways to apply it to everyday life. My mind is filled with why's and I put effort into finding them out. If I only knew someone who would challenge me in such a way! I'd love that so much.
And finally back to the topic at hand: I understand it is human nature to want family and children but I would really like to avoid that. It is possible you know. If I am financially stable and find a partner, I wouldn't mind adopting but I have no desire to go through pregnancy. I've been with many guys but have slept with only a couple. I have had a wide range of sexual experiences and have a very good understanding of what I like. I love experimenting and tend to be pretty open minded about sex. The only thing I cannot do is have sex with someone who isn't attractive to me. It's not looks that does it, it's the attachment to someone who I admire and love. Then I truly enjoy it and can give it everything I have.
I think you take yourself way to seriously, lighten up already. You think you are smart so you want to have sex with only smart guys, great, find guys that you think are smart.
Most women think the guy they are banging is smart, even if he is a retard, what else is new.
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: qman]
#15935183 - 03/11/12 11:04 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Way to miss the point of everything I said. It's ok, I expect it from most people.
|
Hologram
BoxGobbler



Registered: 12/12/09
Posts: 16,793
Loc:
|
|
Idk i cant say i dont get emotionally involved but almost all the sex i have is NSA cause i just dont ever really "date". Ive had one girlfriend out of many partners and she ended up a fwb as well. i sitll shag 'er a few times a year n I can get all gay and depressed cause i like her but i never overstay my welcome or otherwise affect her life when she wants/needs me gone.
I've kind of accepted and like that chicks are just fucking me whereas it sometimes would bother me when i was a teen cause i wanted a g/f.
TLDR; Everyones Got their own life and two people trying to force changes over a simple shared physical attraction is silly and not the only option.
|
Anonymous #3
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15935322 - 03/11/12 11:30 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Honestly TTT, I think you present yourself in a manner that reflects where you want to be in your life, not necessarily where you are... As a formal high school drop out that went on to get a degree in Physics, I respect you for that. Your still so young, and have nothing but time in front of you.
There is nothing wrong with you wanting someone intelligent; in fact many “intellectual” guys tend to enjoy women who are either not as smart, or smart in other ways. The last thing I would want in a partner is someone that could debate me about transcendental calculus equations, or tell me there is a more efficient way for me to be performing an experiment that I’m working on. I much rather go home to my hippy girlfriend and let all of my academic related grief fly right over her head. Which is why I am dating a message therapist/yoga instructor. She keeps me “Hip”. 
If my original post came off as cruel, I apologize.
|
Hologram
BoxGobbler



Registered: 12/12/09
Posts: 16,793
Loc:
|
|
yea, i hatd everything my girl liked.
bitch would get high n watch maury and id just look at her and be jealous of how happy she was and in turn it would make me really happy.(i hate talk shows and believe that shit rots your brain)
|
greys
Mushroom Dork



Registered: 07/16/06
Posts: 37,370
Loc: nunya
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said: Honestly TTT, I think you present yourself in a manner that reflects where you want to be in your life, not necessarily where you are... As a formal high school drop out that went on to get a degree in Physics, I respect you for that. Your still so young, and have nothing but time in front of you.
There is nothing wrong with you wanting someone intelligent; in fact many “intellectual” guys tend to enjoy women who are either not as smart, or smart in other ways. The last thing I would want in a partner is someone that could debate me about transcendental calculus equations, or tell me there is a more efficient way for me to be performing an experiment that I’m working on. I much rather go home to my hippy girlfriend and let all of my academic related grief fly right over her head. Which is why I am dating a message therapist/yoga instructor. She keeps me “Hip”. 
If my original post came off as cruel, I apologize.
My spiceometer just exploded.
|
Hologram
BoxGobbler



Registered: 12/12/09
Posts: 16,793
Loc:
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: greys]
#15935382 - 03/11/12 11:41 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
ha! tht gave me a funny visual
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
|
ebkkl fuck thissss
Edited by TTT (03/13/12 04:36 PM)
|
Anonymous #4
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15937310 - 03/12/12 01:43 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said:
Quote:
Anonymous said: Honestly TTT, I think you present yourself in a manner that reflects where you want to be in your life, not necessarily where you are... As a formal high school drop out that went on to get a degree in Physics, I respect you for that. Your still so young, and have nothing but time in front of you.
There is nothing wrong with you wanting someone intelligent; in fact many “intellectual” guys tend to enjoy women who are either not as smart, or smart in other ways. The last thing I would want in a partner is someone that could debate me about transcendental calculus equations, or tell me there is a more efficient way for me to be performing an experiment that I’m working on. I much rather go home to my hippy girlfriend and let all of my academic related grief fly right over her head. Which is why I am dating a message therapist/yoga instructor. She keeps me “Hip”. 
If my original post came off as cruel, I apologize.
It wasn't cruel at all! I enjoyed it.
I know I am not where I want to be, that is why I am not dating. I don't believe the kind of person I'd even want to be with would want me right now. Shit, I wouldn't want me! I have a long ways to go but I'll get there. I just want friends who will help me attain my dreams by them being passionate about theirs and helping me with the shit I fail at.
I would definitely prefer a partner who was much brighter than me but I also have big dreams for myself and a plan I must follow. I want a research partner and someone who is as in love with everything around them as I am. Not a super driven, intelligent guy who comes home and doesn't show me any of it just because they want a break. Fuck that shit. I could never ever be content being some lowly yoga instructor or work in retail or some dreadful bullshit, either. No offense to your girl!
I present myself how I am. I do know a lot for someone in my position, especially when compared to people who are in school now that I am friends with. However, I know what I don't know and try to avoid fronting like I am an all knowing expert... but that doesn't mean I haven't done my research. The big picture gets more complex but clearer every time a new piece gets added to the complex puzzle that is understanding the process of life. I love learning, it truly is the only reason why I want to live. I want to understand everything.
ANYWAY NSA IS dumb stupid. k
<mod edit: user has been banned>
The average Yogie is probably more enlightened and easier on this earth than you will ever be. It sounds like you have done absolutely NOTHING with your life. You just spend Waaaaaay too much time on the internet acting like your better than other people. Until of course, someone points out your hypocrisy, then you basically say "well im not better than you right now but im going to be in the future"... Your one of those people that always talks about bettering themselves but fall short when it requires any effort, so you just sit there and do nothing (or in your case, post on the internet). You think you are an intellectual but you couldn’t even finish Highschool???!!! And you’re making fun of yoga instructors who are doing something more than being a lazy ass 20yr old, or flipping burgers, or whatever it is that you do.
You’re too much! And your right, you are part of the PROBLEM quit judging others! The only reason you are accepted here is because this place is full of desperate men. If you were a dude, other users would constantly point out your hypocrisy and idiocy. In fact, your little fan base is probably the only reason you come here. You're obviously insecure and get validation by pretending your someone THAT YOU'RE NOT, and enjoy the attention you get on here!
The funny thing is you don't even realize how narrow minded you are. For someone that is an *enlightened individual and "analyses life and everything about it" that is...
Get a life
Edited by Anonymous (03/12/12 03:04 PM)
|
Anonymous #5
|
|
harsh.
all her posts are usually TLDR for me so i dont mind her.
|
Anonymous #2
|
|
I think TTT sounds dreamy
|
Anonymous #3
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said:
Quote:
TTT said:
Quote:
Anonymous said: Honestly TTT, I think you present yourself in a manner that reflects where you want to be in your life, not necessarily where you are... As a formal high school drop out that went on to get a degree in Physics, I respect you for that. Your still so young, and have nothing but time in front of you.
There is nothing wrong with you wanting someone intelligent; in fact many “intellectual” guys tend to enjoy women who are either not as smart, or smart in other ways. The last thing I would want in a partner is someone that could debate me about transcendental calculus equations, or tell me there is a more efficient way for me to be performing an experiment that I’m working on. I much rather go home to my hippy girlfriend and let all of my academic related grief fly right over her head. Which is why I am dating a message therapist/yoga instructor. She keeps me “Hip”. 
If my original post came off as cruel, I apologize.
It wasn't cruel at all! I enjoyed it.
I know I am not where I want to be, that is why I am not dating. I don't believe the kind of person I'd even want to be with would want me right now. Shit, I wouldn't want me! I have a long ways to go but I'll get there. I just want friends who will help me attain my dreams by them being passionate about theirs and helping me with the shit I fail at.
I would definitely prefer a partner who was much brighter than me but I also have big dreams for myself and a plan I must follow. I want a research partner and someone who is as in love with everything around them as I am. Not a super driven, intelligent guy who comes home and doesn't show me any of it just because they want a break. Fuck that shit. I could never ever be content being some lowly yoga instructor or work in retail or some dreadful bullshit, either. No offense to your girl!
I present myself how I am. I do know a lot for someone in my position, especially when compared to people who are in school now that I am friends with. However, I know what I don't know and try to avoid fronting like I am an all knowing expert... but that doesn't mean I haven't done my research. The big picture gets more complex but clearer every time a new piece gets added to the complex puzzle that is understanding the process of life. I love learning, it truly is the only reason why I want to live. I want to understand everything.
ANYWAY NSA IS dumb stupid. k
<mod edit: user has been banned>
The average Yogie is probably more enlightened and easier on this earth than you will ever be. It sounds like you have done absolutely NOTHING with your life. You just spend Waaaaaay too much time on the internet acting like your better than other people. Until of course, someone points out your hypocrisy, then you basically say "well im not better than you right now but im going to be in the future"... Your one of those people that always talks about bettering themselves but fall short when it requires any effort, so you just sit there and do nothing (or in your case, post on the internet). You think you are an intellectual but you couldn’t even finish Highschool???!!! And you’re making fun of yoga instructors who are doing something more than being a lazy ass 20yr old, or flipping burgers, or whatever it is that you do.
You’re too much! And your right, you are part of the PROBLEM quit judging others! The only reason you are accepted here is because this place is full of desperate men. If you were a dude, other users would constantly point out your hypocrisy and idiocy. In fact, your little fan base is probably the only reason you come here. You're obviously insecure and get validation by pretending your someone THAT YOU'RE NOT, and enjoy the attention you get on here!
The funny thing is you don't even realize how narrow minded you are. For someone that is an *enlightened individual and "analyses life and everything about it" that is...
Get a life 
You need it chill. Have you considered that the way she acts is out of necessity in order for her to feel satisfied with her life? Maybe subconsciously she builds herself up to keep herself from being depressed about her life. Whenever someone is judgmental it is because of something within them that they aren’t satisfied with, otherwise there would be no need to get gratification from elevating yourself above others. Whenever someone behaves this way the joke is always on them, not the other way around.
As for my girlfriend, she is not just one thing. She knows exactly who she is and reaches out to grab what she wants out of this world every day. And the amazing thing about her is that she would never say something negative about someone else. Not even TTT, so again, the joke is on her. If it makes TTT feel better about herself to date smarter people (opposites DO attract after all), or elevate herself on the internet than no harm no foul. Think of the bigger picture.
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
|
fuck this
Edited by TTT (03/13/12 04:37 PM)
|
greys
Mushroom Dork



Registered: 07/16/06
Posts: 37,370
Loc: nunya
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15938755 - 03/12/12 07:31 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
One of them got banned.
I think you have made some concise points. but you come off as a Naive Realist, not a Transactionist thinker. Not a jab, just an observation.
Good Times
|
Anonymous #3
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15938761 - 03/12/12 07:32 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: I personally could never be satisfied with myself as a person being a yoga instructor because I see it as a waste of my potential.
Thankfully you don't have to be just one thing. it's good that you think you have potential, irregardless of the fact that you seem to be confused by the meaning of the word.
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex *DELETED* [Re: greys]
#15938773 - 03/12/12 07:34 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by TTTReason for deletion: This is kind of ridiculous
|
Hologram
BoxGobbler



Registered: 12/12/09
Posts: 16,793
Loc:
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15938780 - 03/12/12 07:36 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
id give you the business...
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/07/06
Posts: 3,516
Last seen: 41 seconds
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15938990 - 03/12/12 08:24 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: It's all good. I am naive, I am only 20. These are just my opinions as they stand with the limited experience and information I've gathered during this time in my life. I would never claim I know everything.
I am quite certain I am capable of doing just about anything I set my mind to. Some anon taking jabs at me on teh interwebs can't come close to shaking that. indeed
Whatever,
back on topic and such
You sound very immature and rude in your writings, why say a statement like "I would never be satisfied with myself being a yoga instructor". It comes off as agoranut, why is teaching yoga so degrading? What better have you done?
What have you taught? What knowledge do you have to teach anything? Sure, maybe you have potential, so what, but that does not give you the right the bash other occupations.
Maybe if you spent less time trying to convince yourself about all the wonderful things you might do some day, and how special you are, and how nobody will have the privilege to have sex with you, and might actually get something accomplished.
I agree, you are naive at the age of 20, and with your attitude I don't see the great potential you see in yourself.
|
Anonymous #3
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15939072 - 03/12/12 08:39 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: I personally could never be satisfied with myself as a person being a yoga instructor because I see it as a waste of my potential. That was not a shot at your girlfriend. If teaching people yoga makes her happy, right on! I just could never do something like that.
I'm not sure why you are comparing yourself to my girlfriend to begin with. I certainly never compared the two of you so im not sure why you even felt the need to... Insecurity? Talk is cheap anyway, and all you do is *talk about your potential, you don't provide any evidence of it.
It's nice that you think you have potential, but from what you have revealed about yourself anything challenging, even meagerly so like completing high-school has defeated you. So maybe you shouldn't get ahead of yourself. Less talking and more doing.
|
Hologram
BoxGobbler



Registered: 12/12/09
Posts: 16,793
Loc:
|
|
OH SNAP!
|
Anonymous #2
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: qman]
#15939124 - 03/12/12 08:48 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|

The nerve!
Yoga instructors are known to be pot smokers and deadbeats. Yoga is unscientific spiritual mumbo-jumbo which is only good for preforming fellatio on myself because having orgasms is better than improving my body or mind, check science if you disagree
|
Anonymous #3
|
|
I think that pretty much sums up the "depth" of TTT's logic right there.
|
Anonymous #2
|
|
I'm actually into yoga, just kidding. I probably like it better than sex.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 20,307
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: qman] 1
#15940866 - 03/13/12 04:59 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said: You sound very immature and rude in your writings, why say a statement like "I would never be satisfied with myself being a yoga instructor".
It is an immature statement. I bet that within 5 or 10 years, TTT will see that bit differently. When I was 20 I used to think like that too.
Funny story btw: I have a friendwho studied physics and then proceeded to go to the most prestigious business school in the country. Talking about potential: he developed all the potential he had. After getting the diplomas, he started to work as a consultant. But then guess what? His intellectual and professional development was rewarding, sure (both financially and emotionally), but there was still an unfulfilled feeling. Something was missing. And then the whole spiritual awakening came. He started doing yoga, meditation, he split up with his long-time girlfriend (who was and still is a workaholic), started his own business in consulting and he started to work 2 or 3 days a week instead of 5 or 6. And he became a yoga instructor. He's probably the most enlightened, well-balanced person I have ever met.
Moral of the above story? Talent is one thing, but fulfillment is another. If you are a brilliant businessman but your heart isn't in business, then I am convinced that from a personal and a societal perspective, you probably create more value (including non-financial value) if you decide to do something that you really go for.
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: koraks]
#15941411 - 03/13/12 11:23 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I never claimed to have achieved anything great but I suppose you can continue making assumptions about me.
Edited by TTT (03/13/12 04:39 PM)
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 20,307
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15941419 - 03/13/12 11:28 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: The goals I am trying to go for are just a bit more difficult and complex than teaching people to build muscle strength, toning and balance.
Good grief. No wonder nobody takes you seriously. I don't think I've ever heard of someone with so little life experience deriving so much false confidence from her prejudice.
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex *DELETED* [Re: koraks]
#15941435 - 03/13/12 11:33 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by TTTReason for deletion: This is kind of ridiculous
Edited by TTT (03/13/12 11:46 AM)
|
Hologram
BoxGobbler



Registered: 12/12/09
Posts: 16,793
Loc:
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: koraks]
#15941459 - 03/13/12 11:44 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Im guessing youve never taught strength toning or balance.
i cant speak for yoga but back when i trained the talent of my coaches was irreplacable yet thier skillset is not as esteemed as it deserves to be.
"At the top of the mountain we are all snow leopards"-HST
what i took that quote to mean was that at the peak of your profession or hobby you are the same as others who have reached their peak in their profession.
Although the details are different, the sense of absolute confidence and the way that your life completely changes for the better are almost identical no matter what you pursue as long as its to the best of your abilities.
Anyways i dont know why u are getting so much shit.
even if u thought yoga was a gay dishonorable profession, thats your right.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 20,307
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15941482 - 03/13/12 11:54 AM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: I am so confused. I am being honest!
So am I. And I swallowed a lot of my words before I even typed them, but there comes a point at which I can't keep em in anymore either. And this is it. You're getting the truth now, and all of it. I hope it will help you in one way or another.
Quote:
That IS what yoga is.
Perhaps for some people, but for most yoga practitioners I know, it is more about the meditative aspect of it.
Quote:
I actually really respect yoga, it's just not what I would do with my life.
Sure, and I respect that. What everybody is falling over is that every time something isn't the right thing for you at this point in time, you make it seem like it is despicable altogether. Get it through to your: the fact that you don't like something doesn't mean that others shouldn't like it either. If you find yoga a waste of your talent, then fine, but it isn't a waste of talent to some other people; hence my earlier example of the businessman-turned-yoga instructor. And if you think NSA doesn't work for you, then fine again, but it works perfectly for others. You keep going to great lengths to somehow attempt to justify your personal views on the basis of a more general theory (you don't like NSA because it is doomed to fail, you don't want to become a yoga instructor because it would be a waste of your talent) but sooner or later, you'll have to acknowledge that those 'insights' are nothing more than your personal feelings.
Quote:
What I am trying to do with my life is a bit more difficult, that is all.
It would be easier if you drew a more distinct line between your personal views and generic knowledge. I'm pretty sure of that.
Quote:
Too bad it's just the Shroomery that seems to think of me as a naive, stupid, immature 20 yr old nothing with no potential.
1. Shroomery is home to a lot of intelligent people. They may not all be thoughtful or politically correct, and there's a few retards among us as well, but you can count on it that if you annoy people here, you annoy people in real life. The difference is that the latter may not have the balls to speak up to you. It's your choice if you want to maintain that situation or if you want to show that your mind is a lot more open than you make it out to be. 2. You are naive and immature in the sense that you appear to be unaware of the fact that you come across differently from how you are. I believe you are an intelligent, sensitive and open-minded person who is genuinely trying to learn from others in order to develop herself. But you often come across in this forum as a belligerent, annoying and arrogant person who has no respect at all for the choices other people make in their lives. I used to be exactly the same when I was 20. I'm still the same at 30, but now I'm at least aware of it and sometimes, when I think it's appropriate, I can hide it. I can only recommend you to do the same - you'll learn a lot that way. 3. You definitely have potential, but it's going to go nowhere if you don't open up to other people. Wisdom isn't only in your physics books. It's in every conversation, in every relationship and -yes- even in every meaningless act of lustful sex. If you can't learn from that, then that doesn't say something about those things - it says something about you.
Quote:
Please answer something for me: Why is this thread turning into a thread trying to bash me when I haven't insulted anyone in this thread at all?
See above: it's your trying to justify your own choices and bashing the choices of others in the process. I'm a tolerant and patient person with a huge amount of respect for other people's views, shortcomings and strengths, but that aspect of your posts irritates the FUCK even out of me. So there you have it.
And again, don't get me wrong - I respect your views and who you are. Sou seemed genuinely puzzled why you get so much flack on this forum and I thought I'd give my 2cts.
|
TTT
Cultivate the inside


Registered: 08/07/06
Posts: 4,340
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex *DELETED* [Re: koraks]
#15941529 - 03/13/12 12:11 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by TTTReason for deletion: This is kind of ridiculous
Edited by TTT (03/13/12 12:18 PM)
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 20,307
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15941543 - 03/13/12 12:15 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Sure. You're the one who is right and everyone else is wrong. It's an evil world.
|
greys
Mushroom Dork



Registered: 07/16/06
Posts: 37,370
Loc: nunya
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15941580 - 03/13/12 12:31 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
When I said naive realist, it doesn't and shouldnt carry the connotation of age...you can be a naive realist at 80. It is a method of perception based upon the theory that your percieved experiences tranfer over to others.
ex I eat a lemon and it is sour, everyone who tastes a lemon experiences the same thing that I do
A transactionist perception would be
I taste the lemon and it is sour, there is something going on with the lemon and there is something going on with me. Everyone perceives the lemons flavor differently than I do..even people who thinks its sour perceive the sour differently than I do.
As far as the Yoga Instructor chestnut going around here, You are taking the job of Yoga instructor literally, not as the metaphor that it is. Many people study for one career, and may abandon it after a few years in the field (disallusionment)or simply never pursue a career in their chosen discipline at all. It is very common.
The notion that we must all have some career that confers a high degree of respect and status is simply a mendacity put forth by corporate america and Institutitions of secondary and post secondary education in westernized society. It is a notion that insist upon itself and satisfies someone elses goals...not your own.
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/07/06
Posts: 3,516
Last seen: 41 seconds
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15941584 - 03/13/12 12:32 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
TTT,
What I have noticed in my years of experience, the people that have accomplished the most, talk very little about their achievements.
The people that have big plans for the future, talk very little about their goals, only if asked for the most part.
The people that are high earners respect all types of work, why? Because they most likely worked all types of jobs in their younger days, and appreciate the work ethic involved in all types of jobs.
The people that value the most meaningful relationships with their partners are the less likely to preach or judge others of their sexual habits.
I have seen people degrade others because of the cloths they wear or the car they drive, they were surprised when I tell them they have millions of dollars of net worth and high level degrees from some of the best universities in the country.
The point is prejudging other people and talking yourself up non stop is not going to get you very far, people will see through it, like many on this board have done.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 20,307
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: qman]
#15941593 - 03/13/12 12:35 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
qman said: The people that are high earners respect all types of work, why? Because they most likely worked all types of jobs in their younger days, and appreciate the work ethic involved in all types of jobs.
That, and those people recognize the interdependencies and connectedness between all types of work, which is a prerequisite for surviving and thriving in high-ranking positions. But that's even more off-topic than the rest of this page...
|
Hologram
BoxGobbler



Registered: 12/12/09
Posts: 16,793
Loc:
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: TTT]
#15941603 - 03/13/12 12:41 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TTT said: I had to stop reading. I am just not going to reply. You guys have an entirely warped view of how I am.

dont take it too personally
Im a junkiewhore monster tard to most on here but am actually pretty chill irl.
Edit; also fuck what these dudes think and thier stupid labels.
Perception IS Reality IMO. So whatever you believe, no matter how fuked ppl think it sounds, it will become so for you. Belief, without a doubt, is the strongest tool we humans have. it has beaten cancer and paralysis so its definitely capable of getting people to conform to your reality.
Tldr; Read up on Frame control and Creating your own reality...
IRL thangs are completly different. Body language and so much more play huge roles in getting people to accept your way of thinking. IF you believe something without a doubt and this belief improves your quality of life its radiates off of you. When i am at my peak people gravitate to me and things just fall into place. If i got on here to explain it, which i have, id just get called a narcissistic egomaniac. That has even happend IRL but the difference is IRL i ended up sexing the person who thought i was full of myself and couldnt, as i bragged, get whatever and whoever i want.
but i did. and it was great.
Edited by Hologram (03/13/12 12:51 PM)
|
hellokitty
money or your life...



Registered: 01/01/12
Posts: 305
Last seen: 2 months, 11 days
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: koraks]
#15941606 - 03/13/12 12:43 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
its easy, fuck fat woman nsa. you wont catch feelings because you would be to embarrassed to be seen with the broad, but its still fun as hell
|
Anonymous #6
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: hellokitty] 1
#15941619 - 03/13/12 12:49 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
NSA = National Syphilis Association.
|
Anonymous #2
|
|
Quote:
qman: The people that are high earners respect all types of work, why?
No, sorry, no, they don't. Damn manager mentality. People who sell their soul as shady manipulators get paid, and the people who do "work" get fucked over by shady manipulators who want to take credit for this work.
I think this thread proves that we are too prone to emotions and getting stuck in our ways to ever have NSA anything.
|
Deekay



Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 3,146
Loc:
Last seen: 19 hours, 48 minutes
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: koraks]
#15942365 - 03/13/12 04:27 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
this thread got really epic, really quick!
|
pwnasaurus
Stranger



Registered: 07/16/08
Posts: 8,317
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 44 minutes
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said:
Quote:
qman: The people that are high earners respect all types of work, why?
No, sorry, no, they don't. Damn manager mentality. People who sell their soul as shady manipulators get paid, and the people who do "work" get fucked over by shady manipulators who want to take credit for this work.
I think this thread proves that we are too prone to emotions and getting stuck in our ways to ever have NSA anything.
He wasn't talking about managers at McDonald's...
Edited by pwnasaurus (03/13/12 07:04 PM)
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 20,307
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said:
Quote:
qman: The people that are high earners respect all types of work, why?
No, sorry, no, they don't. Damn manager mentality. People who sell their soul as shady manipulators get paid, and the people who do "work" get fucked over by shady manipulators who want to take credit for this work.
Sounds like you need to meet some inspiring managers. They are out there.
|
Anonymous #2
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: koraks]
#15942822 - 03/13/12 06:24 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sounds like you need to meet some inspiring managers. They are out there.
Well lucky for me these are just NSA jobs and I can walk out on them without giving a shit. I just need to start being as picky about the people I work with as I am with the people I sleep with.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 20,307
|
|
Well, if it pays the bills.
But then you'd still have to sort the job thing out
|
Anonymous #3
|
Re: Questions about NSA sex [Re: koraks] 1
#15946507 - 03/14/12 04:18 PM (1 year, 2 months ago) |
|
|
This thread should be re-named to "TTT's official intervention"
|
|