|
Oweyervishice
You're Vicious

Registered: 05/07/08
Posts: 410
Last seen: 2 hours, 28 minutes
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: Izord]
#8402365 - 05/14/08 08:08 PM (3 months, 22 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Izord said: No, just trying to show how "Intelligent Design" theory could be something other than rubbish.
There are some things that are pretty difficult to explain by a process of random evolution like the little pulley at the top of the eye socket that one of the eye muscle tendon runs through.
I find random evolution more acceptable than I.D. by a magical boogeyman who "created" us by snap of his fingers and wave of his magick wand.
At the same time, it appears pretty obvious that we are headed rapidly toward an understanding of biology and technology that COULD allow us to fabricate a type of life that has the potential to leave us behind and never look back.
What if some scientist makes a new kind of DNA analog in a lab that is so superior to what currently exists, using nano-tech and CAD and molecular biology, that it self arranges into a rudimentary life form that say grows exponentially faster than everything else, and has integrated adaptive mechanisms that allows it to evolve.... ?
You see where this is headed?
Forget the matrix here please, doesn't belong in this thread anyway. Sorry I brought up something like that.
I don't think the matrix is that different from this. What if we created a super-realistic simulation of the universe, including consciousness? Those beings would live out their lives unaware that they were created by a previous civilization.
-------------------- I found myself going away
Never wanting to go back again.
Leaving all my thoughts behind
Searching for some new ones inside.
I found myself.  
|
Izord
Stranger

Registered: 02/05/08
Posts: 19
Last seen: 13 days, 21 hours
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: NiamhNyx]
#8402639 - 05/14/08 09:10 PM (3 months, 22 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
NiamhNyx said: Who designed our designers than? If we're too complex to be random, then logically our creators would be even more complex than us and would have logically had to be created by a yet more complex species as well. Where does it begin? Again, either chaos or a magical omnipotent being. I'm sticking with the theory of evolution as it's the only one that has any supportive evidence.
No, What I'm saying is that technology would allow us to create something MORE complex and more advanced than ourselves. Just as we would be more advanced than our creators, and they would be more advanced as their creators.
Each "Generation" if you will takes advantage of existing bio-molecular science to fuse the electro-mechanical technology with the biological at the sub-cellular level to take the next iteration up a notch. The preceding bio-generation has no chance to compete against the new paradigm and is probably quickly digested or simply discarded.
|
Izord
Stranger

Registered: 02/05/08
Posts: 19
Last seen: 13 days, 21 hours
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: Oweyervishice]
#8402698 - 05/14/08 09:24 PM (3 months, 22 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Oweyervishice said:
Quote:
Izord said: No, just trying to show how "Intelligent Design" theory could be something other than rubbish.
There are some things that are pretty difficult to explain by a process of random evolution like the little pulley at the top of the eye socket that one of the eye muscle tendon runs through.
I find random evolution more acceptable than I.D. by a magical boogeyman who "created" us by snap of his fingers and wave of his magick wand.
At the same time, it appears pretty obvious that we are headed rapidly toward an understanding of biology and technology that COULD allow us to fabricate a type of life that has the potential to leave us behind and never look back.
What if some scientist makes a new kind of DNA analog in a lab that is so superior to what currently exists, using nano-tech and CAD and molecular biology, that it self arranges into a rudimentary life form that say grows exponentially faster than everything else, and has integrated adaptive mechanisms that allows it to evolve.... ?
You see where this is headed?
Forget the matrix here please, doesn't belong in this thread anyway. Sorry I brought up something like that.
I don't think the matrix is that different from this. What if we created a super-realistic simulation of the universe, including consciousness? Those beings would live out their lives unaware that they were created by a previous civilization.
Yes, yes true. But I'm not discussion simulations. Just real actual bio-physical existence. Let's please not talk about the Matrix in this thread ok?
It seems to me that random evolution would actually have the potential to produce something infinitely complicated, given an infinite time of course. I know some people believe there are limits to the age of the universe.
But a created organism would not be infinitely complicated, I don't think. (Maybe it's possible)
So once we map out where every gene goes, and what each enzyme does, we can make an embryo. Which will grow into a human being.
Life as we know it depends on DNA, basically. Sequences of 4 nucleides. (Watson or Crick said he discovered the structure while under the influence of LSD, but this has been debated.
So imagine making a better sequence of genes, leaving out the genes for genetic diseases. Imagine figuring out a way to make a coding sequence that is even better than DNA. Stronger faster more robust. What if we used our vast computational power and "folding" ability to figure out a way to make a better DNA that has the capability to make better faster stronger enzymes? With improved Ribosomes? And improved methods of memory storage and logical deductive abilities?
What if a bacteria based on this tec would gobble up all life and spread throughout the solar system and cosmos and evolve to higher forms of life that would discover newer faster means of computing and working with sub-atomic particles.
Get it?
|
Oweyervishice
You're Vicious

Registered: 05/07/08
Posts: 410
Last seen: 2 hours, 28 minutes
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: Izord]
#8402728 - 05/14/08 09:31 PM (3 months, 22 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Izord said:
Quote:
Oweyervishice said:
Quote:
Izord said: No, just trying to show how "Intelligent Design" theory could be something other than rubbish.
There are some things that are pretty difficult to explain by a process of random evolution like the little pulley at the top of the eye socket that one of the eye muscle tendon runs through.
I find random evolution more acceptable than I.D. by a magical boogeyman who "created" us by snap of his fingers and wave of his magick wand.
At the same time, it appears pretty obvious that we are headed rapidly toward an understanding of biology and technology that COULD allow us to fabricate a type of life that has the potential to leave us behind and never look back.
What if some scientist makes a new kind of DNA analog in a lab that is so superior to what currently exists, using nano-tech and CAD and molecular biology, that it self arranges into a rudimentary life form that say grows exponentially faster than everything else, and has integrated adaptive mechanisms that allows it to evolve.... ?
You see where this is headed?
Forget the matrix here please, doesn't belong in this thread anyway. Sorry I brought up something like that.
I don't think the matrix is that different from this. What if we created a super-realistic simulation of the universe, including consciousness? Those beings would live out their lives unaware that they were created by a previous civilization.
Yes, yes true. But I'm not discussion simulations. Just real actual bio-physical existence. Let's please not talk about the Matrix in this thread ok?
It seems to me that random evolution would actually have the potential to produce something infinitely complicated, given an infinite time of course. I know some people believe there are limits to the age of the universe.
But a created organism would not be infinitely complicated, I don't think. (Maybe it's possible)
So once we map out where every gene goes, and what each enzyme does, we can make an embryo. Which will grow into a human being.
Life as we know it depends on DNA, basically. Sequences of 4 nucleides. (Watson or Crick said he discovered the structure while under the influence of LSD, but this has been debated.
So imagine making a better sequence of genes, leaving out the genes for genetic diseases. Imagine figuring out a way to make a coding sequence that is even better than DNA. Stronger faster more robust. What if we used our vast computational power and "folding" ability to figure out a way to make a better DNA that has the capability to make better faster stronger enzymes? With improved Ribosomes? And improved methods of memory storage and logical deductive abilities?
What if a bacteria based on this tec would gobble up all life and spread throughout the solar system and cosmos and evolve to higher forms of life that would discover newer faster means of computing and working with sub-atomic particles.
Get it?
Fair enough, no more matrix from me.
Humans are very self-centered. We'll be sure to toughen up our own genes before using the knowledge to create new life.
-------------------- I found myself going away
Never wanting to go back again.
Leaving all my thoughts behind
Searching for some new ones inside.
I found myself.  
|
NiamhNyx
I'm NOT a 'he'


Registered: 09/01/02
Posts: 3,021
Last seen: 7 hours, 56 minutes
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: Izord]
#8403482 - 05/14/08 11:55 PM (3 months, 22 days ago) |
|
|
What would be the point of engineering new supposedly "superior" lifeforms?
|
Oweyervishice
You're Vicious

Registered: 05/07/08
Posts: 410
Last seen: 2 hours, 28 minutes
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: NiamhNyx]
#8403560 - 05/15/08 12:10 AM (3 months, 22 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
NiamhNyx said: What would be the point of engineering new supposedly "superior" lifeforms?
We could probably learn a lot from the process itself, and from the new lifeforms if they truly were superior. Until they enslave / devour us all, that is.
-------------------- I found myself going away
Never wanting to go back again.
Leaving all my thoughts behind
Searching for some new ones inside.
I found myself.  
|
NiamhNyx
I'm NOT a 'he'


Registered: 09/01/02
Posts: 3,021
Last seen: 7 hours, 56 minutes
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: Oweyervishice]
#8403681 - 05/15/08 12:41 AM (3 months, 22 days ago) |
|
|
We can learn alot from just about anything, I don't see any practical reason to do something like this. It seems like nothing but pure arrogance to me. It's the kind of thing that is done just to prove it can be done, for the ego gratification of the scientist who figures it out.
|
Tchan909
facefaulted

Registered: 07/11/06
Posts: 3,129
Loc: SF Bay Area
Last seen: 14 hours, 48 minutes
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: Lion]
#8403968 - 05/15/08 03:20 AM (3 months, 22 days ago) |
|
|
Last time I shroomed my friend and I simultaneously came to the conclusion that there was an ancient (vastly predating modern civilization in its most embryonic forms), highly-advanced civilization which came to the collective conclusion that the further development of technology was futile and/or dangerous; so they developed the technologies and techniques of shamanism in order to regress to a simpler way of life while maintaining social harmony. Modern civilization is only learning, the hard way, what our ancestors learned tens of thousands of years ago.
Just a tripped-out theory, though.
-------------------- not necessarily stoned, but... beautiful.
The Albert Hofmann Collection
Doctors and other wizards are forbidden under Martian Law!
Edited by Tchan909 (05/15/08 12:34 PM)
|
Izord
Stranger

Registered: 02/05/08
Posts: 19
Last seen: 13 days, 21 hours
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: NiamhNyx]
#8404091 - 05/15/08 04:46 AM (3 months, 21 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
NiamhNyx said: What would be the point of engineering new supposedly "superior" lifeforms?
Because the Russians and Chinese and Some guys on Alpha Centauri are already working on it, and we need to do it first to carry on our genes or philosophy or beliefs or mission or what have you into the next biological/technological paradigm before we get removed from the picture.
It's just one of those things, if we don't do it, someone else will. Whatever civilization/intelligence has the desire and ability to advance will, and whoever doesn't becomes substrate.
|
zouden
Neuroscientist



Registered: 11/12/07
Posts: 1,956
Loc: Australia
Last seen: 1 minute, 54 seconds
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: Izord]
#8404133 - 05/15/08 05:43 AM (3 months, 21 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Izord said: Life as we know it depends on DNA, basically. Sequences of 4 nucleides. (Watson or Crick said he discovered the structure while under the influence of LSD, but this has been debated.
So imagine making a better sequence of genes, leaving out the genes for genetic diseases. Imagine figuring out a way to make a coding sequence that is even better than DNA. Stronger faster more robust. What if we used our vast computational power and "folding" ability to figure out a way to make a better DNA that has the capability to make better faster stronger enzymes? With improved Ribosomes? And improved methods of memory storage and logical deductive abilities?
Indeed, it's certainly possible. But what you have suggested is a phenomenal amount of work. It is many, many orders of magnitude beyond what we can do today. I think we'd be more likely to produce artificial intelligence before we would produce a biological lifeform more advanced than us. Put another way, if (or when) we do create a superior lifeform, it would be technological, not biological. The fact of the matter is that computer/robotic systems offer many advantages over biological ones - in particular, but not limited to, the ability to operate in space.
Hence, if I were designing an advanced race to colonise distant planets, I would make them in the form of robots capable of travelling through space and able to get their energy directly from the sun. They'd also be able to fly once they are on the planet. Since we can't fly, or live in space, without an enormous amount of technology, I am pretty confident we aren't the product of intelligent design by an alien race. I mean, we're pretty amazing creatures, but we're not more amazing than things that I can imagine. If I can imagine better creatures, so can the designer race.
Panspermia, on the other hand, is a much more likely scenario...
-------------------- 9/11 was sketchy but I mean come on
|
backfromthedead
Activated


Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 3,590
Last seen: 1 month, 9 days
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: Tchan909]
#8404704 - 05/15/08 10:03 AM (3 months, 21 days ago) |
|
|
'so they developed the technologies and techniques of shamanism in order to regress to a simpler way of life'
Perhaps the techniques of shamanism lead directly to the advent of technology after one glimpsed 'solutions' to 'problems' of the time. 'Knock and it will be opened...' sorta shite, but way before anyone was into mass deception storytelling??
--------------------
|
NiamhNyx
I'm NOT a 'he'


Registered: 09/01/02
Posts: 3,021
Last seen: 7 hours, 56 minutes
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: Izord]
#8404705 - 05/15/08 10:04 AM (3 months, 21 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Because the Russians and Chinese and Some guys on Alpha Centauri are already working on it, and we need to do it first to carry on our genes or philosophy or beliefs or mission or what have you into the next biological/technological paradigm before we get removed from the picture.
It's just one of those things, if we don't do it, someone else will. Whatever civilization/intelligence has the desire and ability to advance will, and whoever doesn't becomes substrate.
I call bullshit.
|
Izord
Stranger

Registered: 02/05/08
Posts: 19
Last seen: 13 days, 21 hours
|
Re: Intelligent design by previous civilizations [Re: NiamhNyx]
#8405870 - 05/15/08 04:01 PM (3 months, 21 days ago) |
|
|
I call bullshit.
Whatever. He wanted to know what the motivation for doing such a thing would be. Why would someone want to design a better DNA? Because someone else is already doing it. That's such bullshit? OK. It's not like we've never developed any crazy, self-destructive technologies before out of fear that the soviets or chinese would do it first.
But obviously someone would think that making genetically enhanced DNA would give some kind of advantage in the field of agriculture or medicine or something. That's bullshit? If you don't think we're close to doing it, or close to having the understanding necessary, ok.
|
|