|
 BigJonMud
Stranger
Registered: 05/08/08
Posts: 41
Last seen: 4 hours, 56 minutes
|
 Re: Does Pornography Degrade Women [Re: TheCow]
#8390132 - 05/11/08 06:21 PM |
|
|
Men have dragged women by the hair back to their caves for centuries.
Women love getting fucked the way they do in porn. Im sad for men who havent learnt this.
To me, theres no argument. Its all a part ot the polarity of the universe, and with sex as the procreative energy underlying all of it.
|
 OrgoneConclusion
You've got male!
Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 5,654
Loc: Making a delivery
|
|
Quote:
Men have dragged women by the hair back to their caves for centuries.
Men used to drag women by the feet and then they would get full of dirt until Gnarg figured out a better way; in some ways a more important breakthrough than fire.
--------------------
Don't forget to feed the fish.
W-w-w-what?!
|
Cervantes
Devil's Advocate
 
Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 8,512
Loc: Dark Side of the Windmill
Last seen: 1 hour, 48 minutes
|
|
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said:
No dude, you delete yours as you are so late to the party. I already said:
Quote:
If it doesn't, what is the point?
Yes... but how come nobody has told the MOST OBVIOUS joke of 'em all?
Ketchup or Mustard?
Practice safe snacks, kids... and remember to use a condiment!
If somebody has already told this joke they can delete their post. I haven't read any of this thread.
--------------------
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. -Inigo Montoya
Edited by Cervantes (05/11/08 08:05 PM)
|
OrgoneConclusion
You've got male!
Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 5,654
Loc: Making a delivery
|
|
Women generally prefer tropical over mint flavor.
--------------------
Don't forget to feed the fish.
W-w-w-what?!
|
MushmanTheManic
Average Frustrated Chump
Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,186
Last seen: 21 hours, 24 minutes
|
|
Ok, ok, ok, ok, fine. Since the equivocation spree continues on, I'll make it easier for the both of you to address my argument rather than my choice of wording. Replace the word "submission" with the word "subservient" or the phrase "in lower importance or value."
--------------------
This is a signature.
|
OrgoneConclusion
You've got male!
Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 5,654
Loc: Making a delivery
|
|
You cannot undo the past.
--------------------
Don't forget to feed the fish.
W-w-w-what?!
|
MushmanTheManic
Average Frustrated Chump
Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,186
Last seen: 21 hours, 24 minutes
|
|
--------------------
This is a signature.
|
XbollweevilX
Student
Registered: 04/09/06
Posts: 173
Last seen: 2 days, 1 hour
|
|
Mustard FTW
--------------------
There is no such thing as a civilian.
|
Cervantes
Devil's Advocate
Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 8,512
Loc: Dark Side of the Windmill
Last seen: 1 hour, 48 minutes
|
|
Quote:
MushmanTheManic said:
Ok, ok, ok, ok, fine. Since the equivocation spree continues on, I'll make it easier for the both of you to address my argument rather than my choice of wording. Replace the word "submission" with the word "subservient" or the phrase "in lower importance or value."
Perhaps it would be even easier still, if you did the word processing yourself... and rephrased your own thought. 
--------------------
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. -Inigo Montoya
|
MushmanTheManic
Average Frustrated Chump
Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,186
Last seen: 21 hours, 24 minutes
|
|
I don't follow.
--------------------
This is a signature.
|
Cervantes
Devil's Advocate
Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 8,512
Loc: Dark Side of the Windmill
Last seen: 1 hour, 48 minutes
|
|
Quote:
MushmanTheManic said:
Ok, ok, ok, ok, fine. Since the equivocation spree continues on, I'll make it easier for the both of you to address my argument rather than my choice of wording. Replace the word "submission" with the word "subservient" or the phrase "in lower importance or value."
How 'bout you do it yourself?
Understand now?
--------------------
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. -Inigo Montoya
|
MushmanTheManic
Average Frustrated Chump
Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,186
Last seen: 21 hours, 24 minutes
|
|
Argue with myself?
--------------------
This is a signature.
|
MushmanTheManic
Average Frustrated Chump
Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,186
Last seen: 21 hours, 24 minutes
|
|
No. Don't argue with yourself, dummy!
--------------------
This is a signature.
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery
Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 19,188
Loc: underbelly
|
|
Quote:
MushmanTheManic said:
He's right, this thread is forever tarnished. You messed up dude.
--------------------
What the thinker thinks, the prover proves. R.A.W.
I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. R.A.W.
|
Veritas
Registered: 04/15/05
Posts: 7,832
Loc: PNW
|
|
Quote:
MushmanTheManic said:
Ok, ok, ok, ok, fine. Since the equivocation spree continues on, I'll make it easier for the both of you to address my argument rather than my choice of wording. Replace the word "submission" with the word "subservient" or the phrase "in lower importance or value."
You are still making assumptions. Your perception may be that all pornography portrays women as being subservient, and that this is degrading, but this is not necessarily the fact of the matter. If your argument is that specific types of pornography which portray specific women being abused or abased are degrading to the specific actors who are participating in the scene, then I agree with you. As to any generalization of this quality of degradation to ALL porn or ALL women, I must disagree.
--------------------
|
|
login or 
register to post messages and view our members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, encrypted messages, file attachments, board customizations, and much more!
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit 
Reply 
Quote 
