|
 tripsis
doofing biologist
Registered: 04/13/08
Posts: 2,320
|
 science AND technology???
#8372006 - 05/07/08 06:27 AM |
|
|
why is science and technology thrown in together? technology is the filthy bastard child of pure science and although they are well and truly related i feel they oughtta be separated.
science should apply to biology, chemistry and physics, not to technology.
does anyone else feel this way? i don't want come to the science thread and discuss bloody computers. i'm on one dammit, no need to talk about them!
--------------------
   
|
automan
blasted chipmunk
 
Registered: 09/18/03
Posts: 4,040
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved)
#8372009 - 05/07/08 06:30 AM |
|
|
 This thread was moved from Science and Technology.
Reason:
if you want them separated, WA&F is the place to ask. I'll move it there for you.
|
 Anno
Experimenter
Registered: 06/17/99
Posts: 23,932
Loc: my room
Last seen: 2 hours, 9 minutes
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: automan]
#8372018 - 05/07/08 06:36 AM |
|
|
>does anyone else feel this way?
No.
--------------------
The Rich Jerk
Shroomery CMS - Become an Editor!
PF-Tek for Simple Minds
Gobe
|
tripsis
doofing biologist
Registered: 04/13/08
Posts: 2,320
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: Anno]
#8372022 - 05/07/08 06:38 AM |
|
|
lol
fair enough, can't argue with that
--------------------
|
Anno
Experimenter
Registered: 06/17/99
Posts: 23,932
Loc: my room
Last seen: 2 hours, 9 minutes
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: tripsis]
#8372041 - 05/07/08 06:50 AM |
|
|
> although they are well and truly related i feel they oughtta be separated.
Why? If they are "well and truly related", why would you want to separate them?
>science should apply to biology, chemistry and physics, not to technology.
But science DOES apply to technology, very much so!
All I can say is that your suggestion is not very well thought through.
--------------------
The Rich Jerk
Shroomery CMS - Become an Editor!
PF-Tek for Simple Minds
Gobe
|
tripsis
doofing biologist
Registered: 04/13/08
Posts: 2,320
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: Anno]
#8372057 - 05/07/08 07:02 AM |
|
|
ah so shoot me! 
i was just hoping for a more general biology oriented section to this wicked site you have here. but i spose if that's what people wanted to talk about that's what there would be.
cheers
--------------------
|
johnm214
Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 5,198
Loc: Americas
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: tripsis]
#8372079 - 05/07/08 07:12 AM |
|
|
We have a chem and pharmacology forum which can pretty much cover the life sciences and chemistry. I don't know if you are too new to see the chem forum, you might need to be here 30 days or something. Maybe that would help placate you?
I agree though, there isn't enough traffic to justivy a sepperate forum for just science. Chem and pharm (which nobody knows what the hell it is apparently considering they post these questions everywhere buy this forum) is an exception w/ a decent amount of posting.
|
tripsis
doofing biologist
Registered: 04/13/08
Posts: 2,320
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: johnm214]
#8372103 - 05/07/08 07:26 AM |
|
|
ya i know about the chem forum. i was hoping for a purely biology forum, but mycology is great anyway. that's why i'm here after all! oh well, maybe i should make a concerted effort to bring biology into it more
--------------------
|
Visionary Tools
Kiffah
Registered: 06/23/07
Posts: 2,509
Last seen: 11 hours, 53 minutes
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: tripsis]
#8372154 - 05/07/08 07:47 AM |
|
|
I wouldn't like a separate sci and tech forum. If I wanted to talk about directly converting heat into electromagnetic energy, is that theory or if I go on to show Tesla's pyromagnetic patent, does it become technology? It'd do my head in trying to decide between the two.
--------------------
|
johnm214
Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 5,198
Loc: Americas
|
|
Here's how you decide:
Usefull for anything at all? It's technology.
Has no concievable application whatsoever? It's science or math.
|
Atheist
©®ÂZŸ FøøL
Registered: 01/24/06
Posts: 8,454
Loc: USA
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: johnm214]
#8375509 - 05/07/08 11:20 PM |
|
|
Quote:
Has no concievable application whatsoever? It's science or math.
I hope you aren't serious.
--------------------
|
Anno
Experimenter
Registered: 06/17/99
Posts: 23,932
Loc: my room
Last seen: 2 hours, 9 minutes
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: Atheist]
#8376186 - 05/08/08 01:47 AM |
|
|
hehe...
--------------------
The Rich Jerk
Shroomery CMS - Become an Editor!
PF-Tek for Simple Minds
Gobe
|
tripsis
doofing biologist
Registered: 04/13/08
Posts: 2,320
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: Atheist]
#8376401 - 05/08/08 03:14 AM |
|
|
Quote:
Atheist said:
Quote:
Has no concievable application whatsoever? It's science or math.
I hope you aren't serious.
thanks, i felt the same way but couldn't be bothered rising to the bait
--------------------
|
snoot
•ursa • major•
Registered: 01/30/05
Posts: 3,448
Loc: holding the universe toge...
Last seen: 12 hours, 19 minutes
|
Re: science AND technology??? (moved) [Re: tripsis]
#8387899 - 05/11/08 01:24 AM |
|
|
Quote:
tripsis said:
lol
fair enough, can't argue with that
can't argue with what? Why bring up such subjects if you can't argue such things.
--------------------
dont worry, only fools worry
~~~
".. and sometimes I'll just bring out those funny noises that feel good too me." - B.B. King
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
~ Dr. Seus
Production Gourmet
|
|
login or 
register to post messages and view our members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, encrypted messages, file attachments, board customizations, and much more!
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit 
Reply 
Quote 
