Home | Community | Message Board


Avalon Magic Plants
Please support our sponsors.

Feedback and Administration >> Website Announcements and Feedback

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Amazon Shop for: Ayahuasca, Banisteriopsis Caapi, Morning Glory Seeds, Salvia, San Pedro, Syrian Rue

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
OfflineOneMoreRobot3021
punky jewster
Male


Registered: 06/06/03
Posts: 60,644
Loc: new york city
Last seen: 7 hours, 1 minute
Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience?
    #15027540 - 09/04/11 02:31 PM (1 year, 8 months ago)

I'm not sure where I fall on this question, but more and more find myself leaning towards yes.  At this point, though there is scant peer-reviewed, "official" research into these chemicals, there is an abundance of information about them on the web, thousands of trip reports.  And they are becoming more popular and less underground.  How often do I hear about or read about dealers selling 2c-e and 2c-i these days?  More than one set of friends texted from Bonnaroo asking for details on "this 2c-e stuff."

Shulgin's creations (and Nichols' creations, and the creations of other psychedelic chemists) have entered the "psychedelic mainstream," for lack of a better term, at least from where I am standing.  If the purpose of websites like the Shroomery is to bring about harm reduction through a freedom of information, I can't help but wonder if it wouldn't be to the benefit of all to move the discussion of these chemicals into the main Psychedelic Experience forum?

Every day there are numerous posts in The Psychedelic Experience already that deal with "research chemicals." At present, these threads are ostensibly moved into Other Drugs Discussion.  The problem there is two-fold. One is that a lot of the posts I see about psychedelic research chemicals are from newly registered users looking for feedback before making some important decisions about substances they may be consuming, users whose post count might not allow them to post in ODD just yet.

The other is that Other Drugs Discussion is the home of discussion for, quite frankly, some different type of drug users than normally post in The Psychedelic Experience. These users tend to be discussing and using drugs with a much more stigmatized view attached to them (which is a problem in of itself, since they're just different drugs, not better nor worse than others.)

As I understand it, the reason that Research Chemicals on the whole were slated under Other Drugs Discussion was a matter of safety, but with the synthetic tryptamines and phenethylamines becoming so prominent in psychedelia at large, I think it's in our better interest and for the safety and informed-ness of all that discussion of those psychedelic research chemicals be combined with the Psychedelic Experience at large.  I would recommend leaving discussion of other RC's (stimulants, MDxx analogs, cathinones, opiate derivatives) etc in Other Drugs Discussion while moving the discussion of psychedelic research chemicals over to TPE.

What do you folks think?


--------------------
Acid doesn't give you truths; it builds machines that push the envelope of perception. Whatever revelations came to me then have dissolved like skywriting. All I really know is that those few years saddled me with a faith in the redemptive potential of the imagination which, however flat, stale and unprofitable the world seems to me now, I cannot for the life of me shake.
-Erik Davis


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblenooneman
Stranger
Male
Registered: 04/25/09
Posts: 5,730
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021]
    #15027589 - 09/04/11 02:39 PM (1 year, 8 months ago)

It's a tough question. I like that the psychedelic experience focuses on the classical psychedelics, but on the other hand it is unfair to the wonderful drugs that Shulgin (and others) have created over the years.

I don't see any reason not to include psychedelic RCs in the psychedelic experience. Especially considering that a lot of the "acid" that people eat may be a DOx.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleAwebig
BAG
Female User Gallery

Registered: 01/24/05
Posts: 25,290
Loc: Sexy Peru
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021]
    #15042909 - 09/07/11 03:43 PM (1 year, 8 months ago)

I Agree, Omr, but you would have to be very well researched to know WHICH ones are "trusted".  So, an RC tab could get dangerous.  Perhaps Shulgins Magic 6 Only to start?

Perhaps the Title of the forum could include, "Classic Psychedelics" or "Trusted Psychedelics(Clunky I know)"...  But tossing things about, ignoring scientific lables for the sake of "safety"/convenience does have a potential to confuse those new to this world...   

Furthermore, sending folks to ODD because they wanna learn about say "5-MEO-Dipt" which is relatively safe, may be the first exposure to a dangerous drug class they may have never had interest in(bath salts, LOL)...  which as a community we have to take responsibility for that.     

The forum description should read much better than it does IMO; Honestly this is the first time I noticed how weak it is(sry to whom who composed it).

"Come here to discuss mushrooms and other natural hallucinogens. For everything to do with tripping, dosage and all your favorite alkaloids, this is your forum!"

Kinda Disney, IMO. 
I don't feel this reflects the truly serious nature(role) of psychadelics... YES, no one is gonna die from taking them;  but there are still plenty of horrible consequences from "Natural Psychedelics"

In my opinion(as well the opinion of many noteable researchers) "Hallucinogens" even though it is still used in an official capacity, the trend to clear up this labels use to NOT include LSD, Psilocybin, Mescaline is on.  Lets be in the forefront, I say! 

A split IS necessary with regard to safety.  Perhaps a criteria could be established to decide upon "trusted psycadelic RC's" that would fit into the catagory of "Trusted".

This definitely could use some attention.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblemuistrue
Inspired by the mystery
 User Gallery

Registered: 03/20/05
Posts: 11,814
Loc: Love Tribe
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021] * 1
    #15045124 - 09/07/11 10:58 PM (1 year, 8 months ago)

I think it's a good idea except for the fact that dosage advice is welcomed in PE because it's for discussing safe natural entheogens. If we added psychedelic RC's to the discussion that could create a problem because of the sensitive dosage with the RC's that would fall under the no dosage advice rule that ODD has in place so the rules would have to be re written to accommodate the new drugs being discussed. Other than that I think it's a great idea.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineOneMoreRobot3021
punky jewster
Male


Registered: 06/06/03
Posts: 60,644
Loc: new york city
Last seen: 7 hours, 1 minute
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: muistrue]
    #15045130 - 09/07/11 11:01 PM (1 year, 8 months ago)

Thanks for chiming in, guys.  Yeah, the more I think about it I absolutely think psychedelic research chemicals should be discussed in TPE, and yes it would require a tweaking of the rules in re: dosage advice, I hadn't considered that thanks.


--------------------
Acid doesn't give you truths; it builds machines that push the envelope of perception. Whatever revelations came to me then have dissolved like skywriting. All I really know is that those few years saddled me with a faith in the redemptive potential of the imagination which, however flat, stale and unprofitable the world seems to me now, I cannot for the life of me shake.
-Erik Davis


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinefungiamongi2
pharmer
Male User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/10/05
Posts: 1,042
Last seen: 1 month, 15 days
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021]
    #15056312 - 09/10/11 02:21 AM (1 year, 8 months ago)

yes, nice work gentleman, as a budding chemist I feel i will be able to contribute in this function.


--------------------
gonna bring her a kiss, make those blues run


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleAquaKet

Registered: 08/05/09
Posts: 3,341
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021]
    #15063453 - 09/11/11 06:15 PM (1 year, 8 months ago)

I believe the answer to be absolutely yes.


--------------------
see The Private Life of Plants and The Vanishing of The Honeybees. to me, both give an incredibly profound message. the first one is a series simply about plants, but plants are not simple, and it illustrates how nature works in perfect harmony. the second is about bees disappearing, and it shows how human technology is sometimes very detrimental to a number of life systems, including humans.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCervantesM
Devil's Advocate
Female User Gallery


Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 15,812
Loc: Dark Side of the Windmill Flag
Last seen: 5 hours, 25 minutes
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: AquaKet] * 1
    #15074060 - 09/13/11 06:42 PM (1 year, 7 months ago)

The lack of scientific research concerns me.

I think experimental discussion is best left to the private forums... because discussion will be theoretical in part.

TPE is a forum for discussion about tripping. ODD is a forum for discussing potentially unsafe chemicals.  While many RC's are likely safe and similar to other psychedelics, the jury is still out. I think we may send a bad signal to the masses if we lump them in with the vegan psychedelics and the well researched synthetics like LSD and MDMA.

To lump RC's into TPE is sorta' like saying 'The Shroomery approves'. I only think we should give our approval when the science is conclusive. This does not mean RC's are all unsafe. It just means we should set a high standard for public discussion.

I feel the same about DXM. It is not safe enough to warrant public discussion... even though it is quite popular among young adults.

Shroomerites, especially the newbs, should take pause and consider their options before taking a substance that is unresearched. They should do the same before discussing substances known to be dangerous or highly addictive. I do not think this community should encourage their newest members to be Guinea Pigs without fair warning.

As new information comes to light, we can adjust accordingly.

Mods of ODD know what they are doing. Mods in TPE do too... but they would need a different skill set if they had to discuss the theoretical safety of unproven substances. I think Mods of public forums should know the substances they discuss... or at the very least, know the research that backs the substances up.

TPE Mods have a shamanistic job. They talk about tripping. They should know their forum members will be safe if they follow the soundest advice offered to them.


--------------------
I know you think you understand the words I have just said to you but, what you fail to realize is, what you thought I said is not what I actually meant by saying what I said, when I said it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblejohnm214M
Male User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 16,557
Loc: Americas
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021]
    #15132257 - 09/25/11 03:39 PM (1 year, 7 months ago)

Yes


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineWiccan_SeekerA
gold foil hat admin
Male User Gallery

Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 33,468
Loc: Virgo Supercluster (or b...
Last seen: 12 minutes, 28 seconds
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021]
    #15133792 - 09/25/11 09:04 PM (1 year, 7 months ago)

As I said almost 7 months ago in the Moderator Forum:

Quote:

Currently, all RC's are directed from the Psychedelic Experience forum to ODD. I propose we have a discussion on letting some, very specific, RC's cross over from Other Drugs Discussion into the Psychedelic Experience forum.

I feel it would be a good thing to do so, but only if we choose our candidates carefully, the ones with a good track record and with certain structural features present or missing.

I want to especially involve our mods with chemical and pharmacological knowledge in the details, but all staffers who want so can participate I feel.

I will name a short list of what I consider suitable candidates, then get into the Why of things.

Quote:

Wiccan's RC exemption list

Quote:

SIMPLE TRYPTAMINES
These particular tryptamines give psychedelic action without distinct side effects or toxicity. All have been used in ayahuasca analogues.

DMT (need I say more?)
MET (chemically & pharmacologically inbetween DMT and DET)
DET (well established since the 1960s)
DPT ("Holy Ghost", well established simple tryptamine, history of therapeutic use and used as the religious sacrament of the Temple of the True Inner Light)




Quote:

4-HYDROXY DERIVATIVES OF THREE OF THE ABOVE SIMPLE TRYPTAMINES
4-HO substitution of these simple tryptamines enhances oral activity, and this substitution as far as is known does not add novel pharmacological or toxic action

4-HO-DMT (Psilocin)
4-HO-MET (inbetween, as above)
4-HO-DET (4-HO-DET received the lab code CZ-74 in the late 1950s by the inventors of the substance, Albert Hofmann and Franz Troxler. The substance was used together with its phosporyloxy-analog CEY-19 in human clinical trials in the 1960s by the German researchers Hanscarl Leuner and G. Baer. No toxicity was shown.)
---> The DPT analog is insufficiently studied and should not be included





Quote:

ACETATE ESTERS OF THE THREE ABOVE 4-HYDROXY TRYPTAMINES
There is no reason to assume that these compounds do anything other than act as a prodrug to the above 4-HO-Tryptamines, when taken by any other route than IV injection, yielding the 4-HO-Tryptamine and acetic acid, just like aspirin is a prodrug for salicylic acid

4-AcO-DMT (yields Psilocin in vivo, the RC equivalent of shrooms, this is in essence "legal psilocin")
4-AcO-MET (inbetween)
4-AcO-DET (yields CZ-74 in vivo)




Quote:

SELECTED PSYCHEDELIC METHOXYLATED PHENETHYLAMINES
Selection of these Mescaline analogs requires extensive use, generic psychedelic action with low side effects and a toxicity probably lower than that of Mescaline.

3,4,5-TMPEA (Mescaline)
2C-B (widely used recreationally, has been extensively used therapeutically, probably very safe, Shulgin himself documented a fourfold OD of the maximum dosage to be without consequence)
2C-D (Has been used therapeutically as LE-25, shallow dose/response curve, threefold OD of the maximum dose has been reported as relatively uneventful)
2C-E (The 2C most widely praised for its depth and merit, very widely used recreationally for a long time without significant issues emerging. Some users take triple or fivefold maximum doses apparently without ill effect. People have used a dose of 5x the maximum oral dose as an intravenous injection and lived.)





Quote:

SEMI-SYNTHETIC LYSERGAMIDES
Semi-synthetic derivatives of Lysergic Acid Amide that probably are relatively safe.
LSD-25 (Lysergide)
LAE-32 (Inbetween LSA and LSD, developed and marketed by sandoz as an experimental psychotherapeutic drug, no adverse somatic reactions found)
LSA (Ergine, main isolate from morning glory/woodrose)
ALD-52 (prodrug to LSD, widely used in the 1960s)









So, all of the above in a nutshell:

Quote:

Wiccan's proposed list of GRAS Research Chemicals

DMT (Dimethyltryptamine)
MET (Methylethyltryptamine)
DET (T-9)
DPT (Holy Ghost)
4-HO-DMT (Psilocin)
4-HO-MET (Metocin)
4-HO-DET (CZ-74)
4-AcO-DMT (Psilacetin)
4-AcO-MET (Metoacetin)
4-AcO-DET (Ethacetin)
3,4,5-TMPEA (Mescaline)
2C-B (Nexus)
2C-D (LE-25)
2C-E (Europa)
LSD (Lysergide)
LAE-32 (N-ethyllysergamide)
LSA (Ergine)
ALD-52 (Orange Sunshine)





There are some very big players MISSING here, for the following reasons:

I'm excluding all tryptamines with either a 5-substitution, an alpha alkyl substitution, and an N-isopropyl or N-allylsubstitution because these substitutions tend to introduce novel and sometimes toxic actions. I agree with 5-MeO-DMT recently being moved to ODD even though it has centuries of indigenous use.

I'm excluding all psychedelic methoxylated amphetamines period (half of PiHKAL) because they all tend to have stronger stimulant action and vasoconstriction, and are less forgiving in overdoses. For the same reasons I have excluded all cathinones (alpha-alkyl-beta-keto-phenethylamines).

MDA, MDMA, MDEA etc are atypical psychedelics with novel actions prone to addiction related behaviors, such as fiending and binge use. Also, they are a scene intimately related with amphetamines and RC stimulants, often found with them in the same pill.

2C-P has too steep a dose/response curve and there are worrisome somatic effects within twice the maximum dose for some.
2C-C has an added sedative action - novel effect
2C-I has many reports of HPPD and some reports of thyroid pain which is worrisome given its iodine content which might indicate thyrotoxicity. 2C-I does appear to adversely interact in people with hyperthyroidism on thyroid hormonal therapy, showing that the thyroid, a tiny but vital organ, is involved in 2C-I's action.

I have excluded all 2C-T compounds. They are much enjoyed (especially T-7 and T-2) but the effective dose varies widely among users and there have been a number of fatalities, some by not-too-outrageous overdoses. It is likely given clues based on fatalities that the 2C-T's or metabolites are MOA-A inhibitors, such as them apparently having a magnifying effect on the cardiovascular action of ephedrine and MDMA, leading to death. The maximum dosage of 2C-T-7, the compound least prone to side effects, is 30mg. Someone snorted 35mg and died.

Personally I would prefer to see Salvia moved to Other Drugs because I don't think its that benign and it is definitely a kappa-opioid agonist, a selective kind of opiate rather than something active on serotonin.

I would like "syrian rue seeds, banisteriopsis caapi and extracts thereof to be used in ayahuasca" to be included in the herbs list and "MAO-inhibitors unrelated to natural harmala alkaloids" to be specifically confined to OOD because pharmaceutical MAOI tend to be much more severe and longlived in action than the natural ayahuasca herbs and extracts.


Ladies and gentlemen, lets discuss this :rainbowcloud:




Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleAquaKet

Registered: 08/05/09
Posts: 3,341
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: Wiccan_Seeker]
    #15134170 - 09/25/11 10:22 PM (1 year, 7 months ago)

I mostly agree with that list but I think 2c-i/2c-c should still be on there.


--------------------
see The Private Life of Plants and The Vanishing of The Honeybees. to me, both give an incredibly profound message. the first one is a series simply about plants, but plants are not simple, and it illustrates how nature works in perfect harmony. the second is about bees disappearing, and it shows how human technology is sometimes very detrimental to a number of life systems, including humans.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblejohnm214M
Male User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 16,557
Loc: Americas
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: Wiccan_Seeker]
    #15134380 - 09/25/11 11:22 PM (1 year, 7 months ago)

I'll have to look into it again, but my recollection was that the 2ct7 deaths weren't very concerning.  There were some publicized deaths with poor reporting, but as I recall, the only deaths from the drug were very large insufflated doses or large doses  with concomitant use of amphetamine derivatives which could explain the death on their own.

Presently I'm not aware of any particular drug interactions or whatever with this drug, and it is qualitatively similar to LSD in my opinion.  I would think it would be appropriate. 

Wikipedia had some relatively misleading/inaccurate info from the media reports, but the drug is novel enough that the deaths had some coverage and you can find the published case studies from the deaths which have more accurate information regarding other drugs taken and so forth.  While the article I found on one of the deaths didn't disclose the name of the deceased, the other information was sufficient to establish who the person was and clarify some of the inaccurate media reports.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleabltsandwich
One-armed duck fucker
Female User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/16/09
Posts: 7,629
Loc: Dildoville Flag
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021]
    #15134698 - 09/26/11 12:32 AM (1 year, 7 months ago)

Well I guess we have two threads about this on the first page but here's some copypasta from the other thread

I proposed it in the other thread and I'll post it here as well since I think it's a good idea.

I think in TPE, there should be an RC subsection so that we can keep the traditional psychs with little/no OD potential separate from the RCs.  In that subsection we should compile and maintain a black list where only bad vendors and scam websites are posted in a sticky at the top.  It's based on member feedback.  That way we don't recommend a vendor to someone, we only recommend against the bad ones.  The most important part is to make sure the list stays up to date consistently, and that it's done fairly to both our members and RC vendors out there.

Shroomery doesn't have any RC vendors as sponsors, so I don't think it will have any impact on their businesses.  I could see how recommending an RC vendor may get Shroomery negative attention though, hence the idea of maintaining a black list.  I could see this idea being an overall benefit to the safety of RC use by our members.

Thoughts?


--------------------
I am the devil, and I am here to do the devil's business.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCervantesM
Devil's Advocate
Female User Gallery


Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 15,812
Loc: Dark Side of the Windmill Flag
Last seen: 5 hours, 25 minutes
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: abltsandwich]
    #15145420 - 09/28/11 04:50 AM (1 year, 7 months ago)

Not bad. I think you are on to something.


--------------------
I know you think you understand the words I have just said to you but, what you fail to realize is, what you thought I said is not what I actually meant by saying what I said, when I said it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePatrickKn
Do Easy
Male

Registered: 07/10/11
Posts: 3,900
Last seen: 5 months, 22 days
Re: Should psychedelic research chemicals be discussed in The Psychedelic Experience? [Re: Cervantes]
    #15145467 - 09/28/11 05:14 AM (1 year, 7 months ago)

Edit: NVM


--------------------


Edited by PatrickKn (09/28/11 05:17 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Amazon Shop for: Ayahuasca, Banisteriopsis Caapi, Morning Glory Seeds, Salvia, San Pedro, Syrian Rue

Feedback and Administration >> Website Announcements and Feedback

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* research chemical policy: hypocritic and elitist kapowsin 2,386 10 04/02/02 11:05 AM
by SouthernGent
* Research chemical online distributors as shroomery vendors? SillyWilly 1,138 7 07/02/04 01:17 AM
by ATWAR
* Research chemical policy is not legal protection Rail_Gun 1,166 6 11/08/01 02:04 PM
by Crobih
* Psychedelic Science in the 21st Century Conference - hosted by MAPS in San Jose, April 15-18, 2010
( 1 2 3 4 all )
MAPS Conference 6,767 79 05/04/10 11:18 AM
by dwpineal
* Horizons: Perspectives on Psychedelics - Sep 19-21 in NYC
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Horizons 10,039 65 09/23/08 10:34 PM
by MaxFresh
* RC discussion in ODD... suburbanned 564 12 07/18/10 12:47 PM
by suburbanned
* Why are source discussion not allowed ? Brainiac 797 9 01/10/07 02:19 PM
by Koala Koolio
* The Chemical Research Policy is stupid pants 2,081 17 11/05/01 06:00 PM
by ellisd

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Ythan, eris, Thor, Seuss, geokills, Sell Your Soul
906 topic views. 0 members, 2 guests and 0 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:
MagicMushrooms.org
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2013 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.096 seconds spending 0.001 seconds on 17 queries.