|
deCypher


Registered: 02/10/08
Posts: 53,700
|
question for circastes
#13667303 - 12/21/10 08:40 PM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
OK, so I liked something you mentioned before about being able to completely control our thoughts considering that our thoughts/brain chemistry can influence our own thoughts/brain chemistry. But how does one actually go about doing this? If some external event makes me sad, say my grandmother dying, then it's very natural to feel extreme sadness and depression upon hearing of this. How can I overcome natural neurological tendencies and make myself happy again in a short span of time?
-------------------- We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
 
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery



Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 79,809
Loc: underbelly
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: deCypher]
#13667369 - 12/21/10 08:52 PM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
What is a "short span of time"?
I'm going to put my two cents in here and bet circastes to the punch.
Anyways use logic to bring yourself back to an even keel. You just have to have the same faith in your logic that you have in your neurotic superstitions.
--------------------
"Hang on tightly, let go lightly" -anonymous
“under the present brutal and primitive conditions on this planet, every person you meet should be regarded as one of the walking wounded. we have never seen a man or woman not slightly deranged by either anxiety or grief. we have never seen a totally sane human being.”
― Robert Anton Wilson
|
deCypher


Registered: 02/10/08
Posts: 53,700
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: Icelander]
#13667378 - 12/21/10 08:54 PM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I realize that with enough time emotions tend to mellow out and acceptance becomes a lot easier, but it seems like circastes is advocating/living a mental state wherein he has total control over what he thinks/feels.
-------------------- We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
 
|
Cups
technically "here"


Registered: 12/24/09
Posts: 1,924
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: deCypher]
#13667410 - 12/21/10 09:01 PM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Once you get enough perspective on your head and how emotions arise and pass away then you can do exactly that.
It's tough work though.... IMO Worth it because you shift from leading a reactionary life...controlled by the world around you...and start blazing your own path.
-------------------- No more words of wisdom.
|
deCypher


Registered: 02/10/08
Posts: 53,700
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: Cups]
#13667415 - 12/21/10 09:02 PM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Cups said: Once you get enough perspective on your head and how emotions arise and pass away then you can do exactly that.
How do you know this? Have you encountered individuals who are capable of instantaneously altering their mental states no matter how external circumstances change them?
-------------------- We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
 
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery



Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 79,809
Loc: underbelly
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: deCypher]
#13667434 - 12/21/10 09:05 PM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
deCypher said: I realize that with enough time emotions tend to mellow out and acceptance becomes a lot easier, but it seems like circastes is advocating/living a mental state wherein he has total control over what he thinks/feels. 
--------------------
"Hang on tightly, let go lightly" -anonymous
“under the present brutal and primitive conditions on this planet, every person you meet should be regarded as one of the walking wounded. we have never seen a man or woman not slightly deranged by either anxiety or grief. we have never seen a totally sane human being.”
― Robert Anton Wilson
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery



Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 79,809
Loc: underbelly
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: Cups]
#13667438 - 12/21/10 09:05 PM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Cups said: Once you get enough perspective on your head and how emotions arise and pass away then you can do exactly that.
It's tough work though.... IMO Worth it because you shift from leading a reactionary life...controlled by the world around you...and start blazing your own path.
Show me the man with total control?
--------------------
"Hang on tightly, let go lightly" -anonymous
“under the present brutal and primitive conditions on this planet, every person you meet should be regarded as one of the walking wounded. we have never seen a man or woman not slightly deranged by either anxiety or grief. we have never seen a totally sane human being.”
― Robert Anton Wilson
|
deff
just relax



Registered: 05/01/04
Posts: 7,058
Loc: nowhere
Last seen: 8 hours, 15 minutes
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: Icelander]
#13667441 - 12/21/10 09:06 PM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|

..lol j/k
--------------------
|
Owce
Stranger

Registered: 05/02/10
Posts: 34
Last seen: 1 year, 5 months
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: deff]
#13667751 - 12/21/10 10:12 PM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
the answer can be only beauty, right? It transmutes sadness and despair into melancholy.
Pink floyd works for me.
Or do you mean only by mental powers, without tools? Why?
|
Cups
technically "here"


Registered: 12/24/09
Posts: 1,924
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: deCypher] 1
#13668598 - 12/22/10 12:55 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
deCypher said: Have you encountered individuals who are capable of instantaneously altering their mental states no matter how external circumstances change them?
You shouldn't think of it as altering how you feel irregardless of the circumstance. Instead, think of it as not being affected by the event in the first place.
Every time you let something affect how you feel you are in essence becoming a slave to that something. For example if you get mad when a guy cuts you off in traffic...for those 5 minutes you're mad you have, in effect, given that guy control of your life. 
How you distance yourself from this is to switch from reacting to observing. First key to this is mindfulness.
Quote:
deCypher said: seems like circastes is advocating/living a mental state wherein he has total control over what he thinks/feels. 
So what? Have you ever meditated deCypher? If so you know that anyone can clear their mind of unwanted thoughts for a few moments at least. With practice this can be increased to an hour or 2 or 3...So, why is it so hard to believe someone can achieve all day mindfulness?
With training humans can do amazing things. Run 2 hour marathons, hold their breath for 6 minutes, recite pi to a thousand places. While there are genetic/physical limitations to athletic achievement...stilling the mind is possible for any one. (as far as I know)
Don't confuse stillness with zombie like states. You still think, the difference your thoughts are controlled. The rambling uncontrolled negativity and anxiety is gone. So are random off topic thoughts.
For example if you're running late to something you may notice you're late. This is a fact and helpful.
However, you will not start a thought train like- I'm late. Oh my god I am so late. I'll never be there on time...everyone will be mad at me...I am so fucking stupid. etc etc etc
That thought train starts at exaggeration and moves into speculation real quick. 
While all this is well and good it simply is not enough in itself to end the reactionary mental state that caused the problems to begin with. What mindfulness does do is present us with the chance to examine every situation free from our usual set of knee jerk responses.
I'll say upfront that I am NOT on board with everything in any branch of buddhism, but the concept of the three characteristics is a very nice one. This is a set of aspects found in any thing or situation which you can use to examine it. First is impermanence, next is unsatisfactoriness, and the last is no-self.
So, in the situation you described.
#1- Impermanence. Self explanatory. The end result for every thing is cease to be a thing. Nothing earth shattering here. Believing in any other outcome is delusional.
#2- Unsatisfactoriness. Your relationship with your mother...even if every single moment was excellent...is inherently unsatisfactory because at some point it will inevitably end. This doesn't mean that you shouldn't have or enjoy the relationship...but to believe that it will will never end is delusional.
#3- No Self. This gets a little tricky depending on what you believe but IMO anyone who's honest can come to understand that what we identify as ourselves, our personality, is not "real". If you have any doubt of this consider a head injury patient who literally becomes a different "person" overnight. Something lost so easily cannot be "self".
Extrapolating further it soon becomes clear that the "person" who you loved as your mother simply does not truly exist. Likewise, the "person" who will be sad and miss her after she's gone doesn't truly exist either. Once that's realized...Regardless of what you believe happens after death there is no reason to be sad.
If you believe in nothing after death than a human body has died and nothing is lost. If nothing is lost sadness/anger/etc is delusional.
If you believe in some sort of everlasting soul/heaven/reincarnation type thing then as the minister say- Rejoice! Your mother's spirit is in the care of a higher power who is infinitely better at this kind of thing than you are. The only remaining reasons to feel sad are selfish ones...and since "you" don't technically exist selfish reasons are delusional.
Last, if you believe in a unity type thing then your mother has returned to the Source and nothing is lost. If nothing is lost sadness/anger/etc is delusional.
Sooooooooooooo....The end result of all of this is you can always see reality exactly as it truly is.
In this context negative thoughts simply do not happen. If they do, then you are deficient in one or both areas of mindfulness and examination or "right view" as the buddhist's call it.
Thanks for giving me the chance to write this out. Good to see I have a decent grasp of the things I think I have a decent grasp of.
-------------------- No more words of wisdom.
|
Cups
technically "here"


Registered: 12/24/09
Posts: 1,924
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: Icelander]
#13668602 - 12/22/10 12:56 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Icelander said:
Show me the man with total control?
Give me some more time.
-------------------- No more words of wisdom.
|
circastes
Being too serious


Registered: 01/14/10
Posts: 5,639
Loc:
Last seen: 32 minutes, 3 seconds
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: Cups]
#13668977 - 12/22/10 02:29 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Okay, well, I'll say what I know as simply as possible:
Your emotions can be enacted with imagination. You probably know this most commonly from fantasising about the opposite sex, or whatever - you feel love, when they're not even nearby. In the same way you can enact anger, sadness, pity, self-pity, and so on.
So that must mean when the situation actually occurs in front of your eyes, the reaction is still imagination anyway. (I don't mean to say that you're imagining it and it's not real, but rather that imagination is reality - it's all happening inside you)
So what is it that MAKES you feel that emotion regardless of your interests? Attachment and force of habit. How do you fix this? Imagine the situation, then imagine reacting how you want to react. Do it over and over and over again.
You will find eventually, that no, you do not become numb, you simply detach your emotional reactions which have been wired to react to certain places, people, things - or general situations like routine social environments. You don't then lose your emotions, instead, you get to keep them for yourself, which is the way it should be.
All you're changing is the responses from involuntary to voluntary.
It really works.
This method also works for releasing potentially repressed anger, sadness, and whatnot, because the subconscious mind does not know the difference between what is imagined and what is 'happening', because, as I say, despite the lack of sensory input they are one and the same.
EXAMPLE
Say you don't want to react every time someone calls you short.
Imagine you've just been called short.
Cull the reaction as soon as it occurs.
Do it again.
And again.
Until the reaction is felt to be voluntary.
Voila you've began to control your emotions.
-------------------- "Your salvation may lie in a rational apprehension of the present moment."
-Terence McKenna
she said there's good men
that there's God in everyone
|
lolwut
Gone Troppo

Registered: 08/14/10
Posts: 2,062
Loc: The Lost Woods
Last seen: 54 seconds
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: circastes]
#13669045 - 12/22/10 02:53 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Why would you want to control emotions? They arise as an evolutionary response to certain situations, based off DNA and past memories, experiences, and so on. It's understandable if you see yourself as "against" emotions, but to me, emotions are the flavours of life.
Culling the emotion is just repressing it by diverting your attention. It's still there, and you can divert your attention to the point where you wont notice the diversion (or think its voluntary) but the emotions are still arising, you've just tricked yourself into not feeling them. Which in my opinion will lead to false logic/rationalisations, because you're not feeling the situation as it is - you're cutting it to fit in with your own mindset.
For example if you loved a girl but diverted all the feelings about it (for whatever reasons), you probably wouldn't be able to express or enjoy that love. If you hated someone and diverted emotions, you're not going to be expressing your true thoughts and ideas - you will be polite, or nice, but you won't be doing what you would of been if you didn't try and change the situation that arose. In certain situations this would be advantageous, but it's nothing amazing or special, or imo, wanted.
Just be aware of the emotions, figure out what caused them to arise and why you feel the way you do, and then you fully appreciate the emotions for what they are - a tool to help navigate yourself through situations. Imagine if you didnt feel fear in a life or death situation, you'd probably die.
-------------------- In old age Diogenes stopped a veteran and asked, “What were you in the last war?”
“Oh, I was only a private,” replied the veteran.
Diogenes rocked as if about to fall. “Ye gods!” he gasped. “At last!” Then after catching his breath he blew out his lantern and went home.
-Osho
|
circastes
Being too serious


Registered: 01/14/10
Posts: 5,639
Loc:
Last seen: 32 minutes, 3 seconds
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: circastes]
#13669050 - 12/22/10 02:55 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Oh and I don't have TOTAL control, I just have enough control that when I walk into a social setting, I can go in there, get what I want, and get out. And I really just go to 'get' fun. And I don't have prejudices - I can completely act like I'm friends with a total asshole. Really. I've done it. All because I just imagined myself not reacting to these sorts of people. It's great.
But say I see a sexy girl. Well, you know, I kind of lose my concentration. I have, actually, taken another method and that is of no sex or masturbation for months at a time which is much like "No Fap September" or whatever, and that has helped that urge become somewhat voluntary, but, you know, it's not like there's an on and off switch for emotions, emotion goes far deeper than that, but you can treat it that way with your imagination and it really does start to put the reaction in your hands rather than in 'theirs'. Like I said it works, but you'll never kill emotion without either brain damage or medication.
What I'm advocating is that instead of being 10% choice 90% reaction, your life can be 10% reaction 90% choice. It seems that no matter how much you imagine things you can't quite get ALL of that emotion into that voluntary control sphere, the sphere just isn't big enough. This has something to do with emotions having a truly deep and meaningful part to play in our consciousness. Love, for example, is divine...
-------------------- "Your salvation may lie in a rational apprehension of the present moment."
-Terence McKenna
she said there's good men
that there's God in everyone
Edited by circastes (12/22/10 03:00 AM)
|
circastes
Being too serious


Registered: 01/14/10
Posts: 5,639
Loc:
Last seen: 32 minutes, 3 seconds
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: lolwut]
#13669067 - 12/22/10 02:59 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
lolwut said:
Culling the emotion is just repressing it by diverting your attention. It's still there, and you can divert your attention to the point where you wont notice the diversion (or think its voluntary) but the emotions are still arising, you've just tricked yourself into not feeling them. Which in my opinion will lead to false logic/rationalisations, because you're not feeling the situation as it is - you're cutting it to fit in with your own mindset.
All I can say is that in MY experience, this is not the case. The emotion simply doesn't arise in many cases. I think for a moment, here's where that emotion fits in, but there's this window, this gap, for me to make a decision.
Like I say in my previous post, sometimes the emotion will pop its head out, because it's like approaching the speed of light - the more you try to get there the harder it is to get there. It's that sort of principle. You never can stomp out emotional reactions altogether, but at the very least I guess you become 'used' to it and you don't take it any further, your body is like, "just this again huh?" And it goes away. Previously, your anger would just envelope you when you say, saw that video of the French girl getting hit that was posted in here recently.
-------------------- "Your salvation may lie in a rational apprehension of the present moment."
-Terence McKenna
she said there's good men
that there's God in everyone
|
deCypher


Registered: 02/10/08
Posts: 53,700
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: circastes]
#13669188 - 12/22/10 03:56 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Thanks for the responses guys.
-------------------- We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
 
|
deCypher


Registered: 02/10/08
Posts: 53,700
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: Cups]
#13669235 - 12/22/10 04:21 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Cups said: If you believe in nothing after death than a human body has died and nothing is lost. If nothing is lost sadness/anger/etc is delusional
Nothing is lost? In this hypothetical situation my own GRANDMOTHER is lost.... she is no longer around to talk to or be with; how is lamenting this fact delusional?
I can definitely see how using the rationalizations you listed can be helpful in overcoming sorrow though.
-------------------- We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
 
|
Cups
technically "here"


Registered: 12/24/09
Posts: 1,924
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: deCypher]
#13669418 - 12/22/10 08:54 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
deCypher said: how is lamenting this fact delusional?
I would submit that lamenting any past event is delusional. 
Quote:
deCypher said:I can definitely see how using the rationalizations you listed can be helpful in overcoming sorrow though.
Rationalization is a negative term. Something we do to hide something we know is wrong from ourselves. Nothing in that post is factually inaccurate as far as I know.
The pain comes from our failure to properly understand these facts...the way things really are.
-------------------- No more words of wisdom.
|
Cups
technically "here"


Registered: 12/24/09
Posts: 1,924
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: circastes]
#13669433 - 12/22/10 09:07 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
circastes said: Your emotions can be enacted with imagination. You probably know this most commonly from fantasizing about the opposite sex, or whatever - you feel love, when they're not even nearby. In the same way you can enact anger, sadness, pity, self-pity, and so on.
So that must mean when the situation actually occurs in front of your eyes, the reaction is still imagination anyway. (I don't mean to say that you're imagining it and it's not real, but rather that imagination is reality - it's all happening inside you)
So what is it that MAKES you feel that emotion regardless of your interests? Attachment and force of habit.
I think the most interesting part of this is that you and I see emotion 99% the same but draw such different conclusions!
You see them as a necessary evil of sorts and seek to control them through further conditioning.
I see them as purely illusory and seek to control them by removing the self and seeing realty as it truly is. Remove the fluff and all that's left is utter peace and tranquility experienced when all fear and doubt have vanished.
Either way...thoughtful and very interesting read Circastes.
-------------------- No more words of wisdom.
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery



Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 79,809
Loc: underbelly
|
Re: question for circastes [Re: Cups]
#13669444 - 12/22/10 09:16 AM (2 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Cups said:
Quote:
Icelander said:
Show me the man with total control?
Give me some more time. 
That's what we all say when we're young.
--------------------
"Hang on tightly, let go lightly" -anonymous
“under the present brutal and primitive conditions on this planet, every person you meet should be regarded as one of the walking wounded. we have never seen a man or woman not slightly deranged by either anxiety or grief. we have never seen a totally sane human being.”
― Robert Anton Wilson
|
|