|
 mushspore
shroomer
 
Registered: 03/07/10
Posts: 49
Last seen: 2 years, 3 months
|
 9/11 truth 
#13179119 - 09/11/10 10:48 AM (2 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Hey guy I was watching conspiracy theory last night about the 9/11 tragedy that affected the world trade centers in New York. Basically the episode proved that the United states Government is behind the massacre. Proof is that One of the trade center was a FBI and government headquarters building. There is scientific proof that there were bombs in each of the buildings in 9/11 that cause them to collapse. A university scientist professor found bomb residue in the buildings, the residue was painted on the walls in the buildings that collapsed. There was a lot of eye witnesses saying that a bomb went off 6 to 7 seconds before the planes even hit the buildings. The Professor then decided to test the highly explosive paint on a single steel beam. The beam exploded and shot into huge mushroom clouds, while as a typical beam with no paint doesn't burn it just melts the steel. A janitor working in the world trade center expressed the bomb came from the broiler room and exploded upward through the building 7 seconds before the planes crashed. The janitor witnessed construction all around the building daily. Could painters be painting this highly explosive paint with out even knowing?
Could this paint be in every single sky scraper in New York?
The FBI covers up the story and in the official FBI investigation report it claims there were no bombs defused. The FBI also denied bomb residue when clearly scientists found bomb residue. The FBI knows that if the truth would be revealed many victims families would be suffering. Many scientists and government officials were threatened by the FBI to not inform the public of what they know about 9/11.
there also has been eye witnesses saying that the hijackers were in the cockpit on the runway right before take off on flight 77. The FBI also took all the information about the pilots and hijackers in the plane. That was in the plane stored in a "black box". Also why didn't the army get involved when there was a air battle. The government planned out the attack secretly and the idea originated from a September 11 1981 bill that claimed to blow sky scrapers in New york to make American start war on foreign lands. Bush wanted the war on Terror and he accomplished his goal by brainwashing Americans in to fighting the war on terror for oil.
I would like to say R.I.P to all the people who died in this tragedy on September 11 2001,
smoke ganja and manifestation of your mind is the true key on discovering the true reality
|
 Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,341
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck 
|
|
so you're willing to accept the work of a known liar with a crappy TV show
that simply rehashes everything found on the net that's been proved false
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
Grav
Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 4,454
Loc:
Last seen: 4 months, 18 days
|
|
so you're willing to accept the work of a known liar(u.s. government)
with a crappy TV show (mainstream news)
that simply rehashes everything (the government tells them) that's been proved false
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,341
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: 9/11 truth [Re: Grav]
#13181786 - 09/11/10 10:15 PM (2 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I dont accept anyone's work, I research and it was researching that our
government may have done this that led me to the truth because so much of
the bullshit I've read and heard was just so obviously fabricated
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
Grav
Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 4,454
Loc:
Last seen: 4 months, 18 days
|
|
please share your conclusions
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,341
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: 9/11 truth [Re: Grav]
#13184177 - 09/12/10 02:17 PM (2 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
novum
crap game
Registered: 03/04/06
Posts: 25,063
Loc: the city of dis
Last seen: 6 hours, 4 minutes
|
Re: 9/11 truth [Re: Grav]
#13184267 - 09/12/10 02:37 PM (2 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Grav said:
so you're willing to accept the work of a known liar(u.s. government)
with a crappy TV show (mainstream news)
that simply rehashes everything (the government tells them) that's been proved false
while any one (or all) of those statments may be true at a certain moment in time, that does lead one to a certain conclusion.
and it has been very far from conclusively proven that the towers were 'brought down'. in fact the preponderance of the evidence goes against your interpretation.
i don't mean to misrepresent your position with out asking, but do you also think that a missile hit the pentagon?
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,341
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: 9/11 truth [Re: novum]
#13184549 - 09/12/10 03:31 PM (2 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
novumorganum said:
do you also think that a missile hit the pentagon?
had to be, how could a huge plane have made this hole
lets ignore the fact that it also did this damage
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
Grav
Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 4,454
Loc:
Last seen: 4 months, 18 days
|
|
All your really pointing out is that something did damage to the building.
It reinforces neither side of the argument.
Unless you can elaborate.
|
Tri High
Whigro
Registered: 05/02/08
Posts: 11,769
Loc: Monaghan, Ireland
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
|
where'd the wings go in at?
--------------------
you just need money to get laid - starfire_xes
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,341
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
they attach to the side of the aircraft
can you be a little more vague please?
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
Hologram
BoxGobbler
Registered: 12/12/09
Posts: 16,793
Loc:
|
|
Quote:
Tri High said:
where'd the wings go in at?
THats a good point....the impact on the towers clearly shows the wings and did not make a clean little hole like on the pentagon
What it comes down to is that there are two sides spitting out information.
In our position our "research" is merely wat we read.
Prisoner#1 believes the goeverments version and the rest of us dont
thats it.
No one knows who is right or wrong...but there are countless eyewitness reports that claim there were explosions before any planes hit.
I for one believe that it was done on purpose to gain support for going to war.
The timing of the attacks are reason for suspicion alone. Bush's approval rating sored to 90% after the attacks.
Some people will always trust in the almighty FOX news and there is no point in trying to convince them
tHey'll quote thier sources and you'll quote yours. They'll say your sources are unfounded and they are sure theirs are correct because blah blah blah
None of us are specialists with this type of shit. YOU DONT KNOW SHIT. YOU QUOTE THE PEOPLE THAT DO THE THINKING FOR YOU.
No one knows and thats all it comes down to.
i THINK it was an inside job
--------------------
NEVER FORGET
seriously.
|
Grav
Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 4,454
Loc:
Last seen: 4 months, 18 days
|
|
Quote:
Hologram said:
i THINK it was an inside job
So do I.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,341
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
Quote:
Hologram said:
Quote:
Tri High said:
where'd the wings go in at?
THats a good point....the impact on the towers clearly shows the wings and did not make a clean little hole like on the pentagon
what clean little hole on the pentagon?
can you illustrate it with a picture for us?
Quote:
What it comes down to is that there are two sides spitting out information.
In our position our "research" is merely wat we read.
Prisoner#1 believes the goeverments version and the rest of us dont
thats it.
this will be the last unofficial warning I'll be giving for trolling today I suggest you heed the warning and discuss the topic
Quote:
No one knows who is right or wrong...but there are countless eyewitness reports that claim there were explosions before any planes hit.
I'd like to read/hear these eyewitness reports of explosions prior
to the planes hitting because this is the first instance I've heard of this
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
Grav
Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 4,454
Loc:
Last seen: 4 months, 18 days
|
|
I'm not trolling, I'd just like to point out that you've shifted the argument away from the the Ground Zero debate and to the Pentagon.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 168,341
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
wasnt me, apparently you're confused
Quote:
novumorganum said:
do you also think that a missile hit the pentagon?
--------------------
there are 923 words in the english language that do not follow the "I before E"
rule, there are 44 words in the english language that follow the rule. this is
the shit our education funding is paying for and these liberals want more money
for education to keep making students stupid
|
Tri High
Whigro
Registered: 05/02/08
Posts: 11,769
Loc: Monaghan, Ireland
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
|
here
--------------------
you just need money to get laid - starfire_xes
|
Grav
Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 4,454
Loc:
Last seen: 4 months, 18 days
|
|
Pris: sorry my mistake. I've been bouncing in between 3 or 4 different 9/11 threads. :/
|
amIawakewhenIdream
Dreamer
Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 104
Loc: The end of time
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
|
Quote:
what clean little hole on the pentagon?
can you illustrate it with a picture for us?
huh? You posted the picture yourself. Where is the plane wreckage of a 757?
There should be tons of wreckage, seats, luggage, PASSENGERS, titanium engines, etc. Where did all this debris go? A few stills of suits picking up torso sized aluminum sheeting isn't enough to convince me of a 757 strike.
also,
This MSM report was only aired once. Hmm
|
Grav
Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 4,454
Loc:
Last seen: 4 months, 18 days
|
|
c'mon AmlawakewhenIdream, how can you argue with this excellent footage?
|
|
Images only 
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Edit 
Reply 
