Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!
|
 veggie
Registered: 07/25/04
Posts: 13,985
Loc: 
|
 The Future of Drug Reform Is Bright 
#12247181 - 03/22/10 05:12 AM (2 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
March 22, 2010 - AlterNet
The Future of Drug Reform Is Bright
The Students for a Sensible Drug Policy conference in San Francisco was a major demonstration of youthful, activist energy to change the drug paradigm
In mid-March, Students for a Sensible Drug Policy organized a conference attended by 470 campus activists in San Francisco to network, strategize, party and share updates on the War on Drugs and the widening range of youth resistance efforts.
SSDP was founded in 1998 in response to a provision in the Higher Education Act that cut off loans and grants to students with drug convictions--even misdemeanors dating back to high school. Some 200,000 students have lost their financial aid in the years since. In 2007 SSDP pushed Congress to limit the Act's applicability to students whose convictions occurred after they sought financial aid.
"Now our effort," says SSDP acting executive director Matt Palevsky, "is to limit [applicability of] the Act to students convicted of felonies."
SSDP now has chapters on almost 200 campuses and is receiving 40 inquiries a month from students interested in starting chapters at their schools. There are 10 overseas chapters and this year's conference --which was billed as "international"--included speakers from the UK, Canada, Nigeria, Colombia and the Mexican border (El Paso, Texas). A satellite meeting held simultaneously in Lagos, Nigeria, drew 70 students from universities, teachers' colleges and high schools. (A planned video feed of select panels from S.F. was canceled due to technical problems.)
Friday, March 12, the first day of the SSDP meeting was devoted to field trips to outposts of the burgeoning medical cannabis industry in the East Bay. A steady rain couldn't dampen the spirits of students touring Oaksterdam University, the Blue Sky Coffeeshop and Harborside Health Center. "Most of these students were from states like New York and Florida, and had never seen a pound of trimmed buds, let alone a dispensary," says Harborside's purchasing agent, Rick Pfrommer. "We showed them how we evaluate cannabis brought to us by growers -- the bioassay, how we check for mold by breaking open the buds We gave them a look through the 30x microscope The typical response was 'Awesome!' Or, 'If only we had a place like this in Gainesville!'"
The conference proper was held on Saturday and Sunday at Fort Mason. The rain had left the skies a clean, deep blue and sailboats bobbed on the sparkling bay. You might say the panels and workshops literally and figuratively covered the waterfront. Saturday morning, for example, SSDPers could choose between three panels: "What do model marijuana dispensaries look like?" featuring the owners of four thriving enterprises; "Could psychedelics become accepted medicine?" with updates on studies of MDMA and psylocibin; and "How does local and state drug policy reform work?" which covered the nuts and bolts of organizing a ballot initiative.
The psychedelics session drew a standing-room-only crowd and continued on through the lunch break. Panelists from the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) presented evidence that psylocibin and MDMA might help terminally ill patients shift their focus from fear of death to making the most of their remaining time. The students' questions, however, focused more on their own use.
"Are psychedelics back?" I naively asked Rick Doblin of MAPS. "If you're talking about college campuses," he said, "Psychedelics never left."
Doblin, 56, has come to appreciate the current generation's approach to reform. "When I first became interested in LSD in 1971," he says, "the attitude was change the system. Immediately. By any means necessary. Knock down the walls. There was tremendous anger because change wasn't occurring fast enough. Nowadays there's an understanding that political change takes time and work. You have to get involved with the committee that makes the rules on your campus and if you don't get the change you wanted today, you keep trying tomorrow."
Doblin has been a paragon of patience in his attempt to help Lyle Craker, a UMass Amherst professor of botany, win federal approval to grow cannabis for FDA-approved research. In Doblin's second talk at the SSDP meeting he said he had some bad news concerning the Craker case. Craker first applied in 2001 for a DEA license and has gotten the runaround ever since. In the last week of George W. Bush's reign, Acting DEA Administrator Michele Leonhart rejected Craker's application. A motion to reconsider kept the case alive until Barack Obama could pick a new DEA administrator. After a year in office Obama nominated Michele Leonhart.
"They had every reason not to reappoint her," Doblin said. "Rachel Maddow revealed on TV that Leonhart spent $123,000 on a charter flight to Colombia when the DEA has its own fleet of 100 planes. Leonhart has been involved with informants who were known liars. We'd heard rumors that the administration was going to bring in somebody from outside to head DEA, but no, the status quo is going to be upheld. It's another sop to the right."
"Granting Craker's DEA application would not cost a penny of government money. It would be completely consistent with their campaign rhethoric and with their stated approach of science over politics. It's something the president could do with a stroke of the pen, immediately. And it would be so much easier and less of a step than ordering the DEA not to conduct raids in the medical marijuana states!" Doblin has heard that "there's fierce resistance at the Drug Czar's office" to granting Craker's application, and that Leonhart is being retained "because [Attorney General Eric] Holder likes her."
MAPS will work with lobbyists from the Drug Policy Alliance, Americans for Safe Access and the Marijuana Policy Project to oppose Leonhart's nomination. Maybe senators Arlen Specter and Richard Durbin will agree to ask her questions about her approach to medical marijuana. Doblin didn't sound optimistic. He noted that the government's recalcitrance had made Lyle Craker, an apolitical plant scientist Doblin recruited a decade ago, "much more dedicated to growing marijuana for medical research."
The relative calm and patience of SSDP activists was evident in the two "campus change" workshops, where students discussed efforts to get small, finite reforms enacted at their schools. Many are working to implement "good Samaritan policies" establishing a student who calls the authorities to report an overdose will not trigger punishment for those who made the call or the student in need of emergency help.
A typical reform measure is the one being planned by students at the University of Michigan to get the state's newly enacted medical marijuana law acknowledged in the school's policy manuals. "Every two years the university reexamines its alcohol and other drug policy," explained Francesca Bardinelli, who heads the SSDP chapter at Michigan. "As of now it doesn't refer to medical cannabis whatsoever. So that's kind of our first step --to get it explicitly written down that medical cannabis is legal in the state. It would be in the administration's interests, too, to have a clear policy."
I asked whether they were going to push for Student Health Services to issue cannabis recommendations. "That would be difficult for a university doctor," Bardinelli said. "There would fear of federal intervention." She personified the practicality of what Palevsky called "DARE generation activists."
|
Annapurna1
liberal pussy
 
Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,368
Loc: innsmouth..MA
|
Re: The Future of Drug Reform Is Bright [Re: veggie]
#12247600 - 03/22/10 06:55 AM (2 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
the title alone is laughable..at least in this country...true..marijuana legalization has gained a political foothold.. but whenever this has happened in the past.. the dreaded silent majority has responded swiftly and brutally at the voting booth...and there is every indication that 2010 will be the most brutal such response yet...
|
 i like cow poo
Seargent Coochie
Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 1,609
Loc: Inside A Pussy
Last seen: 13 hours, 26 minutes
|
Re: The Future of Drug Reform Is Bright [Re: Annapurna1]
#12247862 - 03/22/10 08:03 AM (2 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
bullshit, marijuana is going to be legal in cali verrrry soon 
|
Nymphaea
Smoker/Tripper/Legalizer
Registered: 04/16/09
Posts: 1,542
Loc: Michigan
Last seen: 2 days, 12 hours
|
|
I am pretty sure that Cali is going to legalize. The polls show a majority (56%) support the voter initiative bills.
Once Cali legalizes the debate will intensify. Everyone in the country will be forced to take a second look. Once Cali legalizes I may actually have an excuse to talk to my parents/family/friends/professors about it. Once they legalize I feel like you are removing a little bit of the stigma that comes with supporting reform.
--------------------
|
Annapurna1
liberal pussy
Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,368
Loc: innsmouth..MA
|
Re: The Future of Drug Reform Is Bright [Re: Nymphaea]
#12248865 - 03/22/10 12:14 PM (2 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
nothing could be further from the truth.. the backlash is beginning in CA...theres another thread on CA here ..
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/12227754/page/2
Edited by Annapurna1 (03/22/10 03:05 PM)
|
LongStrangeTrip
Deadhead
Registered: 09/19/09
Posts: 3,366
|
Re: The Future of Drug Reform Is Bright [Re: Annapurna1]
#12250159 - 03/22/10 04:20 PM (2 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Annapurna1 said:
nothing could be further from the truth.. the backlash is beginning in CA...theres another thread on CA here ..
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/12227754/page/2
Thats nonsense and the article you cite has absolutly nothing to do with a voter referendum, or how the people would respond to voting on legalization. For some reason you don't understand that in California, a voter initiate is basicaly the ONLY WAY to skip around getting legeslation through the state house/senate. The bill goes DIRECTLY to voters, and if THEY pass it, IT BECOMES LAW. Waste of time~
--------------------
Nothing I say or do is factual; every single thing I write is a work of fiction. Got no idea what I'm talking about here~
"Once in awhile, you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right"~ (Grateful Dead)
"o puer, qui omnia nomini debes"; "You, boy, who owe's everything to a name"~ Mark Anthony
"Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum."; "Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system."~ Cicero
|
winterone
Earth Wanderer
Registered: 11/08/09
Posts: 230
Last seen: 1 year, 3 months
|
|
Let us hope the drug companies don't step in, like the Mormons did on prop 8, and change the vote.
--------------------
Alice
I wonder if I've been changed in the night? Let me think. Was I the same when I got up this morning? I almost think I can remember feeling a little different. But if I'm not the same, the next question is 'Who in the world am I?' Ah, that's the great puzzle!
| |
|
|
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: veggie
740 topic views. 2 members, 18 guests and 1 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic ]
| | |
|
|
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Shop for: 
Edit 
Reply 
