|
 
Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! Please  login or  register to post messages and view our members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, encrypted messages, file attachments, board customizations, and much more!
|
 Cannabischarlie
Yarry's Apprentice
Registered: 11/28/05
Posts: 9,150
Last seen: 1 day, 11 hours
|
 which would carry a higher penalty?
#8618250 - 07/10/08 04:46 PM (4 months, 22 days ago) |
|
|
I havent been able to find the answer to this....
Since DMT looks like it could be crystal methylamphetamine, and they found a baggy of it, and tested it,
would you be in more trouble because its a schedule 1 and methylamphetamine is schedule 2?
or is that one of those case study things?
I am sure very few people get caught with DMT, I think a lot of D.A's would be like "ok, its illegal, WTF is it?"
I know pot is decriminalized to the point of petty offense (like here in colorado) and is schedule 1.
pot however is closer to legalization than anything else, and considered so benign by most people. so it falls under jurisdiction.
are things charged as "possession of a controlled substance" in most places? thats what i have seen.
for the sake of arguement, lets consider the weight on any of these things the same.
--------------------
 we could all use a little more sunshine.
|
Chemy
Ëmþàñädá §790.23
Registered: 10/05/07
Posts: 5,824
Loc: ༑㉿༑
Last seen: 1 hour, 25 minutes
|
|
Controlled substance schedules have nothing to do with legality or penalties for possession, manufacture, etc. as you pointed out with your marijuana statement.
The same can be said for LSD, mescaline and psilocybin which are schedule 1 and incur usually light penalties for possession, whereas cocaine, synthetic opiods schedule 2's carry heavy sentences for possession.
--------------------
sudo apt-get install Barack-Obama
pu *.Bush
Deleted: B: /Bush/Patriot Act
Deleted: B: /Bush/NSA/AT&T/Warrantless Spying
Deleted: B: /Bush/Economy
Deleted: B: /Bush/Nukalur Weapons
Deleted: C: /Cheney/Control
Deleted: R: /Rice/Tool
|
Cannabischarlie
Yarry's Apprentice
Registered: 11/28/05
Posts: 9,150
Last seen: 1 day, 11 hours
|
Re: which would carry a higher penalty? [Re: Chemy]
#8618613 - 07/10/08 06:02 PM (4 months, 22 days ago) |
|
|
yeah, i figured it had more to do with "recognized medical use"
theres so much schedule 1 shit on there, even with the knowledge from erowid and here, 80% of that stuff is "wtf is that?"
I dont think anything should ever be schedule 1.
pot? you should just be able to buy that at the gas station, or better yet, cut out the crime aspect and just let people grow their own.
--------------------
we could all use a little more sunshine.
|
Crystal G
Skank It Up!
Registered: 06/05/07
Posts: 2,742
Loc: outer space
Last seen: 1 month, 13 days
|
|
What's the point of even having a schedule I if nothing is?
--------------------
WARNING: we like to play with fire & guns, people who play russian roulette with syringes are not sane. clearly we have destructive tendencies, some of us I'm sure have underlying suicidal issues, & 2 of us have escaped from the institution. to follow in our steps would make you a DERANGED FOOL so dont do it!
http://www.lulu.com/content/617721
I am an epigrammatical witticist and nothing you can say will bring me down.
|
Cannabischarlie
Yarry's Apprentice
Registered: 11/28/05
Posts: 9,150
Last seen: 1 day, 11 hours
|
Re: which would carry a higher penalty? [Re: Crystal G]
#8624601 - 07/12/08 08:42 AM (4 months, 21 days ago) |
|
|
what they consider schedule 1 is bullshit, there should be some use for all the things on schedule 1.
--------------------
we could all use a little more sunshine.
| |
|
|
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit 
Reply 
Quote 
