|
 
Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! Please login or register to post messages and view our members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, encrypted messages, file attachments, board customizations, and much more!
|
akb112211
Stranger

Registered: 09/10/07
Posts: 294
Loc: UK&USA
Last seen: 14 hours, 56 minutes
|
yet another commercial cactus ID
#8308805 - 04/20/08 08:27 PM (7 months, 8 days ago) |
|
|
hey everyone, this is my first post in the Ethno garden. I didn't notice a link for rules on cacti ID's so, I'll just post the pics. Sorry that they were all automatically resized. Hopefully there is enough info in them to make a proper ID.
1
1
2
2
3
3 By the way, all three of these cactus pots were labeled with Sorensen Greenhouse inc. barcode stickers.
-------------------- "There never was and never will be,
Nor is there now,
The wholly criticized
Or the wholly approved"
|
plainswalker
Plant Shepherd

Registered: 03/29/07
Posts: 525
Last seen: 4 hours, 16 seconds
|
Re: yet another commercial cactus ID [Re: akb112211]
#8309561 - 04/21/08 01:43 AM (7 months, 8 days ago) |
|
|
Stetsonia coryne and Stenocereus pruinosus.
|
akb112211
Stranger

Registered: 09/10/07
Posts: 294
Loc: UK&USA
Last seen: 14 hours, 56 minutes
|
Re: yet another commercial cactus ID [Re: plainswalker]
#8309901 - 04/21/08 08:49 AM (7 months, 7 days ago) |
|
|
cool, thanks. It appears that the stetsonia has small amounts of mesc. Probably not enough to be worthwhile though. I guess then I'll simply watch these cacti grow. Just a note on identification...I've been IDing fungi for just over a year, and it seems quite easy with a guide in hand(or through the internet). That is, IDing the ones that aren't questionable even to the experts. But cacti seem like they are a different story. There are so many subtleties to train your eyes to see. I'm sure after a little while, these little things will become more apparent. Nevertheless, thanks for the ID.
-------------------- "There never was and never will be,
Nor is there now,
The wholly criticized
Or the wholly approved"
| |
|
|
|